From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo•com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org - remove hackathon
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:17:57 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342516677.79507.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207170009.51016.luke@dashjr.org>
OK, pull request seems good.
FYI we lost money on last year's conference, and are hoping to break even this year. The only people to make profit will be nefario and anyone else we give a share in it (people who help realise it). Otherwise money made goes towards next year's conference and paying for things to make a better conference (like Gavin wanted to attend but couldn't afford a ticket). It is not a commercial event, and I've been pushing to keep the sponsorship and community parts highly separated. Like I really do not wish to sell a speaker slot, but if I have to (to pay the bills) then it will be obvious due to scheduling and disclaimers that speakers are sponsors.
----- Original Message -----
From: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr•org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti•com>; Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo•com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org - remove hackathon
On Monday, July 16, 2012 11:47:02 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Vladimir does raise a fair point, though. Hackathon seems appropriate
> for bitcoin.org as it is focused on dev-related activities. (full
> disclosure: speaking at bitcoin2012.com) The conference might or
> might not be. The conference does seem community focused, so I don't
> object to it being on bitcoin.org... But if consensus prefers
> otherwise, that's OK too.
IMO, bitcoin.org is more community-focussed anyway.
How often do devs use the site, compared to GitHub etc?
Someone else made a pullreq for Bitcoin Magazine; I suggest(ed) that
for-profit organizations should be asked to pitch in some way or another.
Who should organize that, I don't know. If Bitcoin Consultancy/Amir is behind
the conference, I suggest their/his development contributions should be
sufficient in that respect.
> PS. This seems like material for pull requests, which is preferred
> over mailing list email + git push. When working on the satoshi
> client, we all ACK each other's pull req for anything beyond the
> trivial.
I concur, this should be discussed in a pullreq.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-17 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-15 17:52 Amir Taaki
2012-07-15 19:15 ` Vladimir Marchenko
2012-07-16 23:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-17 0:09 ` Luke-Jr
2012-07-17 9:17 ` Amir Taaki [this message]
2012-07-17 9:25 ` Andreas Petersson
2012-07-17 9:54 ` Amir Taaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1342516677.79507.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com \
--to=zgenjix@yahoo$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox