public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo•com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] script tests - invalid script in script_valid.json?
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:41:04 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343659264.6245.YahooMailNeo@web121005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T016OmU2qU1a67=YmpA4VDbzrddOamc8=Mt6x7BhVO1Uw@mail.gmail.com>

Yep, I want to chip in and also express my gratitude for these useful tests. I sent a personal email to Gavin before.

I plan to make some more complex tests by combining several of the simpler ones.



----- Original Message -----
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com>
To: Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon•de>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] script tests - invalid script in script_valid.json?

> Is there interest to port more tests (P2SH, checksig, checkmultisig,
> block verification, maybe even DoS rules) into data-driven format? It
> might be something that I'd like to help with if pull requests in that
> direction are welcome.

Yes, more tests are definitely welcome.

check*sig tests are tricky, because they have to refer to previous
unspent transactions and private keys (so require a particular block
chain to test against). Brilliant ideas on a simple data-driven format
welcome.

block verification tests would be great; a collection of good/bad
block chains, starting from a common chain (maybe the testnet3
tesnet-in-a-box chain) would be very useful for regression testing.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development




  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-30 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-29 16:31 Amir Taaki
2012-07-29 16:33 ` Stefan Thomas
2012-07-29 16:42   ` Amir Taaki
2012-07-29 17:35     ` Stefan Thomas
2012-07-29 18:48       ` Jeff Garzik
2012-07-30  0:52       ` Gavin Andresen
2012-07-30 14:41         ` Amir Taaki [this message]
2012-07-31 14:26         ` Pieter Wuille
2012-07-31 14:39         ` Matt Corallo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1343659264.6245.YahooMailNeo@web121005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com \
    --to=zgenjix@yahoo$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox