Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Dealing with dummy stack element malleability

From: Tom Harding <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:10:40 -0700

On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 using the same parameters for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name "segwit" and using bit 1.
>

This fix has value outside of segwit.  Why bundle the two together? 
Shouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently?