Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternative to OP_EVAL

From: "Luke-Jr" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:06:42 -0500

On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:01:20 PM [email-masked] wrote:
> This is not adequate: <data> OP_SHA256 OP_EVAL runs random code that is
> more than 5 bytes.

So what? Why shouldn't I be able to run random code? I could always put that 
random code in the script verbatim, after all.