From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr•org>
To: Gary Rowe <g.rowe@froot•co.uk>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:17:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201301417.05584.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKm8k+2JcZ++N76HOd+Obr1DR3gG9e+U-gVCHYyN_Eo-4+ciZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, January 30, 2012 2:13:52 PM Gary Rowe wrote:
> Having closely read the BIP20 proposal, I can see your point. As I see it,
> BIP 20 vs BIP 21 is about standardising on a representation of the "amount"
> field. BIP 20 proposes that "amount" can contain alternative
> representations, clearly defined, whereas BIP 21 requires the use of a
> single representation in decimal notation.
>
> In my view, BIP 21 still wins since it reduces complexity for the end
> client both at the human and machine level.
If the goal is to reduce complexity, strtol-compatible amount is the answer ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 18:50 Gary Rowe
2012-01-30 18:56 ` Luke-Jr
2012-01-30 19:13 ` Gary Rowe
2012-01-30 19:17 ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2012-01-31 6:54 ` thomasV1
2012-01-31 13:12 ` Gavin Andresen
2012-01-31 13:20 ` Cameron Garnham
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-31 10:39 [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20)] Pieter Wuille
2012-01-30 18:07 [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20) thomasV1
2012-01-30 18:44 ` Luke-Jr
2012-01-29 23:55 Amir Taaki
2012-01-30 9:13 ` Wladimir
2012-01-31 8:23 ` Andreas Schildbach
2012-01-31 8:35 ` Wladimir
2012-01-31 10:01 ` Gary Rowe
2012-01-31 10:22 ` Wladimir
2012-01-31 11:55 ` Andreas Schildbach
2012-01-31 12:03 ` Wladimir
2012-01-31 10:44 ` Pieter Wuille
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201201301417.05584.luke@dashjr.org \
--to=luke@dashjr$(echo .)org \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=g.rowe@froot$(echo .)co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox