* [Bitcoin-development] Network version increase
@ 2012-04-02 15:23 Pieter Wuille
2012-04-02 16:32 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pieter Wuille @ 2012-04-02 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bitcoin-development
Hello all,
Mike Hearn has submitted a pull request to add a pong message in reply to a ping.
This warrants an upgrade of the network protocol version number, which is since BIP14
independent from the version numbers of the reference client.
Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 60000 is used. We could
simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or we could
do a "cleanup" to 100000 first, and start incrementing from there.
--
Pieter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bitcoin-development] Network version increase
2012-04-02 15:23 [Bitcoin-development] Network version increase Pieter Wuille
@ 2012-04-02 16:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-02 16:42 ` Wladimir
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2012-04-02 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pieter Wuille; +Cc: bitcoin-development
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail•com> wrote:
> Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 60000 is used. We could
> simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or we could
> do a "cleanup" to 100000 first, and start incrementing from there.
It would be nice to have 100000 as the baseline, "frozen" protocol.
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti•com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bitcoin-development] Network version increase
2012-04-02 16:32 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2012-04-02 16:42 ` Wladimir
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wladimir @ 2012-04-02 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: bitcoin-development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 579 bytes --]
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti•com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail•com>
> wrote:
> > Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 60000 is
> used. We could
> > simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or
> we could
> > do a "cleanup" to 100000 first, and start incrementing from there.
>
>
> It would be nice to have 100000 as the baseline, "frozen" protocol.
>
Yes, I think increasing with one is enough for now. Let's not get ahead of
ourselves :)
Wladimir
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 957 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-02 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-02 15:23 [Bitcoin-development] Network version increase Pieter Wuille
2012-04-02 16:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-04-02 16:42 ` Wladimir
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox