public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd•org>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] To prevent arbitrary data storage in txouts — The Ultimate Solution
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:53:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410065316.GA31965@savin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130410030301.GA9921@savin>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1019 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:03:01PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:53:38PM -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> 
> Note how we can already do this: P2SH uses Hash160, which is
> RIPE160(SHA256(d)) We still need a new P2SH *address* type, that
> provides the full 256 bits, but no-one uses P2SH addresses yet anyway.

We can keep the length 160bits:

scriptPubKey: OP_HASH160 OP_HASH160 <Hash160(P2SHv2 address)> OP_EQUALVERIFY

You don't need to change the address type at all if new software is
written to check for both forms of txout in the actual
blockchain/transaction code at the deeper level. Basically now a P2SH
address could actually mean one of two scriptPubKey forms, must like a
normal address can mean either the hashed or bare OP_CHECKSIG form.


Of course, either way you have the odd side-effect that it's now
difficult to pay further funds to a random txout seen on the
blockchain... strange, although possibly not a bad thing.

-- 
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-10  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-10  2:53 Gregory Maxwell
2013-04-10  3:03 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10  3:08   ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10 15:58     ` Jorge Timón
2013-04-11 11:27       ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10  6:53   ` Peter Todd [this message]
2013-04-10  7:15     ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-04-10  7:29       ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10  3:52 ` Robert Backhaus
2013-04-10  3:58   ` Gregory Maxwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130410065316.GA31965@savin \
    --to=pete@petertodd$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gmaxwell@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox