On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:52:31AM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> For block 0x11 again shall there be a separate code for "block is from the
> future"? We don't want to lose the nVersion field to people just using it
> for nonsense, so does it make sense to reject blocks that claim to be v2 or
> v3?

That would prevent us from using nVersion as a soft-forking mechanism.

-- 
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000908fddb47210344de50e6d3bd842e649c68853eeee0390dcd