Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Handling miner adoption gracefully for embedded consensus systems via double-spending/replace-by-fee

From: "Luke-Jr" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:17:13 +0000

On Saturday, March 22, 2014 8:47:02 AM Peter Todd wrote:
> To make a long story short, it was soon suggested that Bitcoin Core be
> forked - the software, not the protocol - and miners encouraged to
> support it.

There's been at least one public miner-oriented fork of Bitcoin Core since 0.7 
or earlier. Miners still running vanilla Bitcoin Core are neglecting their 
duty to the community. That being said, the more forks, the better for 
decentralisation.

Luke