On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:45:09 -0500
Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:38:20AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
> > So right now git head will accept the following invalid transaction
> > into the mempool:
> > 
> > 0100000001140de229e08fda25cbc16ded2618cdacce49fcb18c0b6ccdace00040909adae4000000009000493046022100f7828d81c849c5448ba5ba4ef55df6b4d0ba3ae3f1a59cff3291880c2c8e524f022100d2f5bc9dc2f0674eded31023cb47e61a596e10f8f1ddd44cf92d290c9db577c70144410778d430274f8c5ec1321338151e9f27f4c676a008bdf8638d07c0b6be9ab35c71a1518063243acd4dfe96b66e3f2ec8013c8e072cd09b3834a19f81f659cc3455ac91ffffffff01102700000000000017a914e661a2229cc824329c9409f49d99cb5ac350c9288700000000
> > 
> > which spends the redeemScript:
> > 
> > 0778d430274f8c5ec1321338151e9f27f4c676a008bdf8638d07c0b6be9ab35c71a1518063243acd4dfe96b66e3f2ec8013c8e072cd09b3834a19f81f659cc3455
> > CHECKSIG NOT
> 
> ...and while we're at it, bitcoin-ruby's forked yet again...
> 

It is? How do you reckon? The webbtc node just received a block:
http://webbtc.com/block/0000000000000000006370724f73798f4c00c8da97f675c4dcf4605e9882913c

You mean it would be forked off if this change was released?