Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase

From: Ross Nicoll <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:59:42 +0100

Also, before that's turned into "8MB blocks are infeasible", my presumption is that blocks are not expected to jump suddenly to 8MB, and that most will have time to ramp up storage and bandwidth.

The point about not outright replacing existing test data is the more critical one, anyway, although in retrospect we could simply add spam transactions on top of existing transactions.

Ross

On 23 Jun 2015 08:35, Ross Nicoll <[email-masked]> wrote: