From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd•org>
To: xor@freenetproject•org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:59:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160123205953.GA22494@muck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 847 bytes --]
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 06:33:56AM +0100, xor--- via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> So "+1"ing is OK as long as I provide a technical explanation of why I agree?
> While I still think that this is too much of a restriction because it prevents
> peer-review, I would say that I could live with it as a last resort if you
> don't plan to abolish this rule altogether.
>
> So in that case, to foster peer review, I would recommend you amend the rules
> to clarify this.
> Example: "+1s are not allowed unless you provide an explanation of why you
> agree with something".
I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should
contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation
the last +1 gave isn't useful.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000007e2005be0ce25b3f3de67b2dc35fd810b0ccd77b33eb7be
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 650 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-23 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-21 0:50 Rusty Russell
2016-01-21 2:25 ` xor
2016-01-21 4:35 ` Dave Scotese
2016-01-21 5:00 ` Rusty Russell
2016-01-21 4:44 ` Rusty Russell
2016-01-23 5:33 ` xor
2016-01-23 20:59 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2016-01-23 21:38 ` Gavin
2016-01-24 1:06 ` Dave Scotese
2016-02-09 23:24 ` David Vorick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160123205953.GA22494@muck \
--to=pete@petertodd$(echo .)org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=xor@freenetproject$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox