From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd•org>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com>,
Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2 megabytes
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:24:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160206212419.GA23969@muck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160206211158.GA14053@muck>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1047 bytes --]
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:11:58PM -0500, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 12:45:14PM -0500, Gavin Andresen via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Adam Back <adam@cypherspace•org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It would probably be a good idea to have a security considerations
> > > section
> >
> >
> > Containing what? I'm not aware of any security considerations that are any
> > different from any other consensus rules change.
>
> I covered the security considerations unique to hard-forks on my blog:
>
> https://petertodd.org/2016/soft-forks-are-safer-than-hard-forks
Oh, and to be 100% clear, I should say those are only *some of* the
unique security considerations - for starters the article is mainly
talking about uncontroversial hard-forks, and doesn't even delve into
economic attacks among other omissions. It's just an introductory
article.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000008320874843f282f554aa2436290642fcfa81e5a01d78698
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 650 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-06 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-05 20:51 Gavin Andresen
2016-02-05 22:36 ` Yifu Guo
2016-02-07 17:09 ` Gavin Andresen
2016-02-05 23:04 ` Btc Drak
2016-02-06 0:12 ` Luke Dashjr
2016-02-06 3:14 ` Jorge Timón
2016-02-06 15:37 ` Gavin Andresen
2016-02-06 17:01 ` Adam Back
2016-02-06 17:45 ` Gavin Andresen
2016-02-06 21:11 ` Peter Todd
2016-02-06 21:24 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2016-02-09 5:11 ` Samson Mow
2016-02-06 21:28 ` David Thomson
2016-02-07 18:49 ` Chris Priest
2016-02-06 17:09 ` Jorge Timón
2016-02-06 17:25 ` Tom Zander
2016-02-06 20:22 ` Chris Priest
2016-02-06 20:46 ` Luke Dashjr
2016-02-07 14:16 ` Gavin Andresen
2016-02-07 15:06 ` Alex Morcos
2016-02-07 16:54 ` Peter Todd
2016-02-07 15:19 ` Anthony Towns
2016-02-07 17:10 ` Jonathan Toomim
2016-02-07 17:24 ` jl2012
2016-02-07 17:56 ` Jonathan Toomim
2016-02-07 21:01 ` Luke Dashjr
2016-02-07 21:33 ` Steven Pine
2016-02-07 22:04 ` Corey Haddad
2016-02-07 22:25 ` Steven Pine
2016-02-06 20:36 ` Luke Dashjr
2016-02-06 22:22 ` Peter Todd
2016-02-07 5:21 ` Jannes Faber
2016-02-07 18:55 ` Jonathan Toomim
2016-02-07 19:03 ` Patrick Strateman
2016-02-07 19:19 ` Trevin Hofmann
2016-02-07 20:29 ` Tier Nolan
2016-02-09 13:59 ` Yifu Guo
2016-02-09 16:54 ` Gavin Andresen
2016-02-10 6:14 ` David Vorick
2016-02-10 6:36 ` Patrick Shirkey
2016-02-10 12:58 ` Tier Nolan
2016-02-07 11:37 ` Anthony Towns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160206212419.GA23969@muck \
--to=pete@petertodd$(echo .)org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gavinandresen@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox