* [bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status
@ 2016-02-08 22:17 Luke Dashjr
2016-02-08 22:41 ` Peter Todd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luke Dashjr @ 2016-02-08 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bitcoin Dev, Stephen Pair, Gavin Andresen, Amir Taaki,
Mike Hearn, Pieter Wuille
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/314 proposes updating the status of many
Accepted BIPs to Final:
BIP 11: M-of-N Standard Transactions
BIP 14: Protocol Version and User Agent
BIP 21: URI Scheme
BIP 22: getblocktemplate - Fundamentals
BIP 23: getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining
BIP 31: Pong message
BIP 32: Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets
BIP 34: Block v2, Height in Coinbase
BIP 35: mempool message
BIP 37: Connection Bloom filtering
BIP 65: OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
This PR has been open for a week, and I plan to merge it within the next week
unless there are objections.
Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to upgrade
five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs ACKs from the
champions of the BIPs:
BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen
BIP 60: Fixed Length "version" Message (Relay-Transactions Field), by Amir
Taaki
BIP 64: getutxo message, by Mike Hearn
BIP 66: Strict DER signatures, by Pieter Wuille
BIP 73: Use "Accept" header for response type negotiation with Payment Request
URLs, by Stephen Pair
Thanks,
Luke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status
2016-02-08 22:17 [bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status Luke Dashjr
@ 2016-02-08 22:41 ` Peter Todd
2016-02-08 22:57 ` Luke Dashjr
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Todd @ 2016-02-08 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luke Dashjr
Cc: Stephen Pair, Mike Hearn, Pieter Wuille, Bitcoin Dev, Amir Taaki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 720 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:17:55PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to upgrade
> five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs ACKs from the
> champions of the BIPs:
>
> BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen
It may be good to update BIP 50 with the new information that calling it
a "hard fork" misses subtleties about what happened during that fork. In
particular, 0.7 rejection of the chain was non-deterministic, based on
having seen a re-org in a specific way.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000001ae7ca66e52359d67c407a739fde42b83ecc746d3ab735d
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 650 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status
2016-02-08 22:41 ` Peter Todd
@ 2016-02-08 22:57 ` Luke Dashjr
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luke Dashjr @ 2016-02-08 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Todd; +Cc: Bitcoin Dev
On Monday, February 08, 2016 10:41:00 PM Peter Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:17:55PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to
> > upgrade five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs
> > ACKs from the champions of the BIPs:
> >
> > BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen
>
> It may be good to update BIP 50 with the new information that calling it
> a "hard fork" misses subtleties about what happened during that fork. In
> particular, 0.7 rejection of the chain was non-deterministic, based on
> having seen a re-org in a specific way.
I agree BIP 50 could use some rephrasing, but the May 2013 change was
definitely a hardfork, despite the problems with the pre-March protocol.
Luke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-08 22:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-08 22:17 [bitcoin-dev] BIP Final status Luke Dashjr
2016-02-08 22:41 ` Peter Todd
2016-02-08 22:57 ` Luke Dashjr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox