Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Forcenet: an experimental network with a new header format

From: Luke Dashjr <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:07:14 +0000

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:01:58 AM Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> There is no reason to use a timestamp beyond 4 bytes.

Actually, there is: lock times... my overflow solution doesn't have a solution 
to that. :x