Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Better MMR Definition

From: Peter Todd <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:31:40 -0500

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:28:18PM -0500, G. Andrew Stone wrote:
> Can an insertion ordered MMR allow an efficient nonexistence proof?

Why do you want a non-existance proof?

It supports an efficient *spentness* proof, which is sufficient for what we
need in Bitcoin, and much more scalable.

-- 
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org