From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr•org>
To: Damian Williamson <willtech@live•com.au>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 177: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 07:21:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201712240721.24971.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PS2P216MB0179FE1CAF04AB860A5F36719D000@PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
BIP 177 is NOT assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers!
Please read BIP 2:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki
Luke
On Sunday 24 December 2017 2:57:38 AM Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP 177: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction Priority For Ordering Transactions In
> Blocks
>
>
> This BIP proposes to address the issue of transactional reliability in
> Bitcoin, where valid transactions may be stuck in the mempool for extended
> periods.
>
>
> There are two key issues to be resolved:
>
>
> 1. The current transaction bandwidth limit.
> 2. The current ad-hoc methods of including transactions in blocks
> resulting in variable and confusing confirmation times for valid
> transactions, including transactions with a valid fee that may never
> confirm.
>
>
> It is important with any change to protect the value of fees as these will
> eventually be the only payment that miners receive. Rather than an auction
> model for limited bandwidth, the proposal results in a stable fee for
> priority service auction model.
>
>
> I will post the full proposal up on to my blog in the coming days and,
> re-review incorporating feedback that I have received on and off thread.
> It would not be true to suggest that all feedback received has been
> entirely positive although, most of it has been constructive.
>
>
> The previous threads for this BIP are available here:
>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-December/subje
> ct.html
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Damian Williamson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-24 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-24 2:57 Damian Williamson
2017-12-24 7:21 ` Luke Dashjr [this message]
2017-12-24 22:20 ` Damian Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201712240721.24971.luke@dashjr.org \
--to=luke@dashjr$(echo .)org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=willtech@live$(echo .)com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox