On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:10:43PM +0900, Karl-Johan Alm wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> > Or via full replace-by-fee, which appears to be used by a significant minority
> > of miners:
> 
> I was of the impression that final transactions (sequence=0xffffffff)
> cannot be RBF'd.

My full-replace-by-fee tree ignores that. It also does preferential peering to
ensure it's well connected with likewise peers, and thus the whole network.

-- 
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org