From: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo•com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 05:50:32 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2122164151.2048223.1433310632572.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.263582.1433245437.2287.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2111 bytes --]
Subject: Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16
1. Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step (Eric Voskuil)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:09:10 -0700
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil•org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB
step
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99•net>, J?r?me Legoupil
<jjlegoupil@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <556CF426.3030204@voskuil•org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On 06/01/2015 08:55 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>> Decentralization is the core of Bitcoin's security model and thus
that's what gives Bitcoin its value.
> No. Usage is what gives Bitcoin value.
Nonsense.
Visa, Dollar, Euro, Yuan, Peso have usage.
The value in Bitcoin is *despite* it's far lesser usage.
Yes, the price is a function of demand, but demand is a function of
utility. Despite orders of magnitude less usage than state currencies,
Bitcoin has utility. This premium *only* exists due to its lack of
centralized control. I would not work full time, or at all, on Bitcoin
if it was not for decentralization; nor would I hold any of it. I doubt
anyone would show an interest in Bitcoin if it was not decentralized. If
it centralized even you would be forced to find something else to do,
because Bitcoin "usage" would drop to zero.
> It's kind of maddening that I have to point this out. Decentralisation
is a means to an end.
No, it was/is the primary objective.
...
e
________________________________________________________I agree Eric, but I would add that demand is more a function of one's lack of faith in one's government and its fiat currency. The value of Bitcoin is
its independence and constancy. Its value doesn't change, only the worth
or worthlessness of corrupt states and their currencies that it's compared
to / exchanged with. I hesitate to say money since money is supposed to
be a store of value over time.
Ron
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4300 bytes --]
parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-03 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <mailman.263582.1433245437.2287.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2122164151.2048223.1433310632572.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com \
--to=rdwnj@yahoo$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox