From: <jl2012@xbt•hk>
To: "'Luke Dashjr'" <luke@dashjr•org>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pre-BIP Growth Soft-hardfork
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 01:53:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22fb01d161d0$84061ce0$8c1256a0$@xbt.hk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201602070952.33457.luke@dashjr.org>
This looks very interesting. The first time implementing it might be more
painful but that will make subsequent hardforks a lot easier.
Do you think it's good to include the median timestamp of the past 11 blocks
after the block height in coinbase? That would make it easier to use it as
activation threshold of consensus rule changes.
For the witness commitment, it will also be treated as a merge mined
commitment?
It is also good to emphasize that it is the responsibility of miners, not
devs, to ensure that the hardfork is accepted by the supermajority of the
economy.
-----Original Message-----
From: bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists•linuxfoundation.org
[mailto:bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists•linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Luke
Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Sunday, 7 February, 2016 17:53
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Pre-BIP Growth Soft-hardfork
Here's a draft BIP I wrote almost a year ago. I'm going to look into
revising and completing it soon, and would welcome any suggestions for doing
so.
This hardfork BIP aims to accomplish a few important things:
- Finally deploying proper merge-mining as Satoshi suggested before he left.
- Expanding the nonce space miners can scan in-chip, avoiding expensive
calculations on the host controller as blocks get larger.
- Provide a way to safely deploy hardforks without risking leaving old nodes
vulnerable to attack.
https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-mmhf/bip-mmhf.mediawiki
Luke
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-07 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-07 9:52 Luke Dashjr
2016-02-07 13:18 ` Tier Nolan
2016-02-07 17:53 ` jl2012 [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='22fb01d161d0$84061ce0$8c1256a0$@xbt.hk' \
--to=jl2012@xbt$(echo .)hk \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=luke@dashjr$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox