From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name>
To: hurricanewarn1@aol•com
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets.
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:21:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2439331.T3Lg2rgENG@crushinator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14f8e4d93c5-1774-fc36@webprd-a78.mail.aol.com>
I've been trying to keep our discussion off-list because it is off-topic, but you keep adding the list back on in your replies.
http://steamforge.net/wiki/images/2/29/Settings-Firewall-Advanced.png
Settings > Firewall > Advanced Configuration > Outbound Protocol Control > All Other Protocols
That's all you had to do.
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 9:44 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 42 in the whole world, and I'm one of them. Clearly that is a problem, do you even know about AT&T or are you in another country? Cause that statement is utterly ridiculous given the fact there are hundreds of millions of people using AT&T. I was simply sharing my knowledge on this issue since it poses a threat to the health of the bitcoin network, no need for personal attacks.
>
> None of my accusations were false, there is a firewall in the DVR that is uncontrolled and all ports are blocked via private subnets and no fixed public IP allowed unless you pay. I confirmed every one of these details with AT&T technicians or I wouldn't be saying them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name>
> To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com>
> Sent: Wed, Sep 2, 2015 5:34 am
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets.
>
>
> According to BitNodes, 42 Bitcoin nodes are running on AT&T's
> network:
>
> https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/?q=AT%26T
>
> So I'm thinking
> there's nothing wrong with AT&T's default network configuration.
>
> Frankly, the
> things you've been writing strongly suggest that you aren't very knowledgeable
> about computer networking. Instead of jumping right into making wild accusations
> about AT&T, you probably should find someone knowledgeable to verify your
> claims.
>
>
> On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 5:20 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > First off I couldn't synch the wallet, it said no block source
> available and there was zero connections. Bitcoin was literally getting thottled
> every second. It would not even allow the connection to get block source. EVERY
> port was blocked, making exceptions in the router firewall did nothing. I was
> forced to use Blockchain.info which is a major security risk.
> >
> > Secondly, I
> am developing a program using Bitcoin Python modules, so I login to my computer
> like it's a server and it was flat out rejecting the connection. I could not run
> any code until this got fixed, and of course needed the block source to even do
> anything.
> >
> > If Bitcoin Core worked but 8333 was blocked I would not be
> emailing the list. Bitcoin Core was crippled and unusable due to the AT&T
> settings, and they tried hard to get me to buy monthly subscriptions to get the
> answer. This makes it likely that Bitcoin Core is unusable for most AT&T
> customers and other ISPs, hence the massive node decline. I'm sure this disrupts
> alot of other people besides Bitcoiners too, hence the monthly subscriptions
> geared towards people who can't figure out their connection situation.
> >
> >
> AT&T literally blocked access to static IP if you don't buy one, so it wasn't a
> normal network setup. Unfortunately the same security used to stop hackers and
> viruses stops Bitcoin too, so this is probably the settings for almost every
> router in the country. Nodes are in fact declining worldwide, down 15% in the
> past year alone. Community needs to speak up and also educate before this gets
> completely out of control. https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/dashboard/?days=365 6,000
> nodes is pathetic as it is and it's constantly declining.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1954364.4gG0cHmrlB@crushinator>
2015-09-02 13:44 ` hurricanewarn1
2015-09-02 19:21 ` Matt Whitlock [this message]
2015-09-02 20:31 ` hurricanewarn1
2015-09-04 9:55 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email hurricanewarn1
2015-09-04 13:47 ` Bastiaan van den Berg
[not found] <2156992.EaWDNESINK@crushinator>
2015-09-02 9:20 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets hurricanewarn1
2015-09-01 7:16 [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in the cable box odinn
2015-09-02 7:20 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets hurricanewarn1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2439331.T3Lg2rgENG@crushinator \
--to=bip@mattwhitlock$(echo .)name \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hurricanewarn1@aol$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox