* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. [not found] <1954364.4gG0cHmrlB@crushinator> @ 2015-09-02 13:44 ` hurricanewarn1 2015-09-02 19:21 ` Matt Whitlock 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-02 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitcoin-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14520 bytes --] 42 in the whole world, and I'm one of them. Clearly that is a problem, do you even know about AT&T or are you in another country? Cause that statement is utterly ridiculous given the fact there are hundreds of millions of people using AT&T. I was simply sharing my knowledge on this issue since it poses a threat to the health of the bitcoin network, no need for personal attacks. None of my accusations were false, there is a firewall in the DVR that is uncontrolled and all ports are blocked via private subnets and no fixed public IP allowed unless you pay. I confirmed every one of these details with AT&T technicians or I wouldn't be saying them. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name> To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com> Sent: Wed, Sep 2, 2015 5:34 am Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. According to BitNodes, 42 Bitcoin nodes are running on AT&T's network: https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/?q=AT%26T So I'm thinking there's nothing wrong with AT&T's default network configuration. Frankly, the things you've been writing strongly suggest that you aren't very knowledgeable about computer networking. Instead of jumping right into making wild accusations about AT&T, you probably should find someone knowledgeable to verify your claims. On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 5:20 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev wrote: > First off I couldn't synch the wallet, it said no block source available and there was zero connections. Bitcoin was literally getting thottled every second. It would not even allow the connection to get block source. EVERY port was blocked, making exceptions in the router firewall did nothing. I was forced to use Blockchain.info which is a major security risk. > > Secondly, I am developing a program using Bitcoin Python modules, so I login to my computer like it's a server and it was flat out rejecting the connection. I could not run any code until this got fixed, and of course needed the block source to even do anything. > > If Bitcoin Core worked but 8333 was blocked I would not be emailing the list. Bitcoin Core was crippled and unusable due to the AT&T settings, and they tried hard to get me to buy monthly subscriptions to get the answer. This makes it likely that Bitcoin Core is unusable for most AT&T customers and other ISPs, hence the massive node decline. I'm sure this disrupts alot of other people besides Bitcoiners too, hence the monthly subscriptions geared towards people who can't figure out their connection situation. > > AT&T literally blocked access to static IP if you don't buy one, so it wasn't a normal network setup. Unfortunately the same security used to stop hackers and viruses stops Bitcoin too, so this is probably the settings for almost every router in the country. Nodes are in fact declining worldwide, down 15% in the past year alone. Community needs to speak up and also educate before this gets completely out of control. https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/dashboard/?days=365 6,000 nodes is pathetic as it is and it's constantly declining. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name> > To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com> > Sent: Wed, Sep 2, 2015 4:32 am > Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. > > > Respectfully, what the heck are you talking about? Practically every home LAN > runs on a private subnet. My own desktop computer has the IP address > 192.168.1.34, which is in a private subnet. This doesn't prevent my Bitcoin Core > node from making outbound connections to other nodes. Moreover, almost all home > Internet connections in the world run on dynamically assigned IP addresses. > Again, this does not cause any problems for connecting outbound to other Bitcoin > nodes. It's true that your node can't accept incoming connections unless you > forward port 8333 on your router to your computer, but you don't need to be able > to accept incoming connections to participate in the Bitcoin network. > > > On > Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 3:20 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > > I > was about to buy a VPS for Bitcoin, but I really do need Bitcoin Core for > business reasons so I didn't give up. I once again thoroughly went through my > computer and made sure there was nothing blocking 8333, a couple useful tools > are CurrPorts and TCPView. I went through the router to make sure there was no > block of port 8333. I researched everything thoroughly and was sure these were > the right settings, but Bitcoin was still getting throttled every second and > stuck in sys_sent, and python kept saying the target was rejecting the > connection. > > > > I finally stumbled upon subnet settings, and saw that I had a > private subnet, one of the few IPs that are private on earth ( > https://www.arin.net/knowledge/address_filters.html ). Uverse put all their > customers on a private subnet by default. This made my computer not only hidden > but unroutable for any computer on the Bitcoin network. That alone is enough to > totally stop Bitcoin connections on any port, but they made it even crazier by > generating a dynamic IP that changes all the time, so public IP was meaningless > for my computer. > > > > I switched over to a public subnet, and right there was > a checkbox to allow incoming connections. My static IP showed for a minute then > became dynamic/hidden again without me even touching anything. The final > roadblock was AT&T charges $15-30/month for a public static IP, which is > obviously insane and actually one could argue that violates their own terms of > service. So the router was still ignoring my public IP settings simply because I > wasn't paying for a public IP, and intentionally changing the settings back. I > asked for a free public IP and there was no response for awhile. > > > > I found > this article on cryptocoinnews while working out: > https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/isps-intentionally-blocking-bitcoin/ It's based > on the first email I sent, and was displayed prominently on their front page. I > posted a tweet publicly about it which referenced AT&T ( > https://twitter.com/turtlehurricane/status/638930065980551168 ) and believe it > or not I had a static public IP and port 8333 was open about 1 minute later. I > don't know if it was a coincidence cause I already messaged them to please do > that an hour before, or if that article and tweet spurred them to action. The > timing was so ridiculous I think it's the latter. Without twitter I probably > wouldn't have succeeded, the technicians on twitter actually answered all my > questions 24/7 unlike phone technicians which were clueless and trying to sell > me a subscription for connection services help. And shout out to cryptocoinnews > for making this public. > > > > So to clarify, it appears AT&T has not blocked > port 8333 itself, but rather effectively blocked all ports via the private > subnet, which makes the computer hidden and unroutable for incoming peers. > Although this severely limits functionality and cripples the ability to run a > full node and many other programs it is understandable, since it just about 100% > prevents hackers from getting in, since they can't even see your computer. What > isn't understandable is that AT&T technicians did not inform me about this until > I changed the settings myself, despite the fact it is a very obvious cause of > ports being blocked. It's probably just ignorance since AT&T has so many complex > network settings it's hard to keep track of, although I have a suspicion that > someone in their command chain is withholding information in an attempt to make > them buy a $15/month connection service, and once they buy that another > $15-30/month is needed to get the static IP. > > > > As far as I know there is no > easy to find info on the internet about private subnets crippling the ability to > use Bitcoin. I believe this needs to be explicitly said in instructions for > running a full node, maybe it wasn't a problem in 2009 but now it is a major > issue. On default settings Bitcoin is 100% blocked, and most people do not have > the time or motivation to fix this. I talked to at least 10 AT&T technicians and > worked on it 2-3 days straight, did not receive the right answer until I found > it myself, although they certainly gave me some useful clues about how the > network works. > > > > I am very happy that AT&T fixed it, since other ISPs like > Comcast appeared even worse. I openly talked with them about Bitcoin and they > showed no prejudice, might've actually made them more willing to help me cause > otherwise they would think I'm a hacker. > > > > tl;dr The good news is anyone > with AT&T can be a full node by getting a public static IP, the bad news is > almost no one will figure this out unless we as a community make it well known. > I guarantee node numbers will improve if this information is spread to everyone. > Database size and computing expenditures is simply not the reason people don't > run full nodes, it's because their ISP has made it just about impossible without > shelling out nearly 100% more money per month. If you don't pay the fee AT&T > would never tell you about the private subnet, at least based on my > experience. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: odinn > <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup•net> > > To: hurricanewarn1 > <hurricanewarn1@aol•com>; bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> > > > Sent: Tue, Sep 1, 2015 3:16 am > > Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has > effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in > the cable box > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > Another note on this subject > > to add to the stuff people have already > > > mentioned... > > > > If you have the AT&T > > landline but don't use AT&T's > standard internet / > > tv (what they call Uverse) > > offering - that is, if you > prefer to use > > some local internet provider - you are > > probably better off > (in terms > > of avoiding not only this sort of > > blockage/censorship but as > well, > > potentially getting a better privacy policy > > that isn't going to > be > > like AT&T's long-term data retention). You can check > > directly with > > > the various local small ISPs to see what their policies > > are > > specifically > on ports and whatnot. > > > > Ideally your ISP should let > > you: > > > > port > forward to SOMEPORTNUMBER for tcp and udp > > > > (above may or may not > > be > helpful for some if you are using > > decentralized markets) > > > > have port > 8333 > > open > > > > (above is for bitcoin of course) > > > > Supposing you have > FTTN because you > > are paying a local ISP for > > internet service, and that > local ISP has contracted > > with AT&T to be > > able to provide service in an > area where old-style DSL has been > > phased > > out, thus your local ISP is > essentially providing you AT&T FTTN. > > (FTTN > > is Fiber to the Node, FTTN-BP > is FTTN Bonded Pair). Even if a > > local ISP has > > its own privacy policy > posted which is different from > > AT&T, everything is > > subject to AT&T data > retention because the FTTN. > > So get yourself a VPN (or set > > up your own) for > your connection. Tor > > will run through the VPN. > > > > General > > observations > - TWC stores your IP and other stuffs for 6 > > months or longer. > > Same for > Comcast. Verizon retains your stuffs for > > 18 month minimum, probably > > > longer though. Qwest/Century, 1 year. > > Cox, 6 months. AT&T retains for > longer > > than a year. This is just > > what they are telling you, the reality > is it's > > probably longer due to > > stuff like > > this: > > > https://www.lawfareblog.com/odni-and-doj-release-last-section-215-collec > > > tion-order > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zach > > G via bitcoin-dev: > > > > I have been struggling to get port 8333 open all year, I > > gave up > > > and > was using blockchain for months despite a strong desire to > > stay > > > on > Bitcoin Core, but now the issue has reached critical mass since > > > > > I'm > using the python Bitcoin server module. I have literally spent > > > my entire > > > day trying to open 8333, I thoroughly made sure it was > > > open on the router > and > > computer and it's still closed. Strangely > > > enough I got it open for > 30 seconds > > once today but something closed > > > it immediately. > > > > > > > After hours of phone > > calls and messaging AT&T finally told me the > > > truth > of what was going on, and > > only because I noticed it myself > > > and demanded > an answer. The internet is > > being routed through a > > > DVR/cable box, and > they confirmed the DVR also has a > > firewall. To > > > make this even more > absurd they refused to turn the firewall > > off > > > because it is their > equipment. So effectively they can firewall any > > > > > port they want even if > the customer asks them not to, in the > > > unlikely event > > the customer > figures it out. > > > > > > Perhaps this is the driving force behind the > > > inexplicable and > > > massive decline in Bitcoin nodes. Bitcoin is being > censored > > by the > > > ISPs themselves, and they won't even tell you that. I > had to get in > > > > > touch with headquarters and threaten to rip it out of the > wall to > > > get a > > proper answer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > bitcoin-dev mailing > > > list > bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org > > > > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > > > > > - > -- > > > > http://abis.io ~ > > "a protocol concept to enable decentralization > > > and > > expansion of a giving economy, and a new social > > good" > > > https://keybase.io/odinn > > -----BEGIN PGP > > SIGNATURE----- > > > > > iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV5VDeAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CvkIH/jy4Vo+My3xeBdvFQmxkJWyQ > > > U5mv2zWEvBYw71Xy1EDzQY1AhEBmatUU1eu2AbOqXdUR4511FxCNzFmTxy6roEiz > > > EehBkvXNbBCbEzLRisjxuQw34OKM+xfieCqE1mzJok2uSdLMMQLcbWL1/k3/OmS5 > > > 9O9z/wMXqU1Jc19MTK+vF1Lz5ilnRn3hEbTaCN3ivYnYFa0DpBH9r0Y07UcoJ6Wr > > > ui/x0sSSuupAGzOkZ75HQ8yeQXckeAu6TB3/jE8QEqNUmAJkmR8eK4ofXZWFrIjy > > > mOKeQL4c+jRQnTR8pt+y89g2QIpzFoHaV5T+WvQuC1t8xNOrxLgYFXWgl0dhoYE= > > =UCLC > > > -----END > > PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 18653 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. 2015-09-02 13:44 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-02 19:21 ` Matt Whitlock 2015-09-02 20:31 ` hurricanewarn1 2015-09-04 9:55 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email hurricanewarn1 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Matt Whitlock @ 2015-09-02 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: hurricanewarn1; +Cc: bitcoin-dev I've been trying to keep our discussion off-list because it is off-topic, but you keep adding the list back on in your replies. http://steamforge.net/wiki/images/2/29/Settings-Firewall-Advanced.png Settings > Firewall > Advanced Configuration > Outbound Protocol Control > All Other Protocols That's all you had to do. On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 9:44 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev wrote: > 42 in the whole world, and I'm one of them. Clearly that is a problem, do you even know about AT&T or are you in another country? Cause that statement is utterly ridiculous given the fact there are hundreds of millions of people using AT&T. I was simply sharing my knowledge on this issue since it poses a threat to the health of the bitcoin network, no need for personal attacks. > > None of my accusations were false, there is a firewall in the DVR that is uncontrolled and all ports are blocked via private subnets and no fixed public IP allowed unless you pay. I confirmed every one of these details with AT&T technicians or I wouldn't be saying them. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name> > To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com> > Sent: Wed, Sep 2, 2015 5:34 am > Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. > > > According to BitNodes, 42 Bitcoin nodes are running on AT&T's > network: > > https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/?q=AT%26T > > So I'm thinking > there's nothing wrong with AT&T's default network configuration. > > Frankly, the > things you've been writing strongly suggest that you aren't very knowledgeable > about computer networking. Instead of jumping right into making wild accusations > about AT&T, you probably should find someone knowledgeable to verify your > claims. > > > On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 5:20 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > First off I couldn't synch the wallet, it said no block source > available and there was zero connections. Bitcoin was literally getting thottled > every second. It would not even allow the connection to get block source. EVERY > port was blocked, making exceptions in the router firewall did nothing. I was > forced to use Blockchain.info which is a major security risk. > > > > Secondly, I > am developing a program using Bitcoin Python modules, so I login to my computer > like it's a server and it was flat out rejecting the connection. I could not run > any code until this got fixed, and of course needed the block source to even do > anything. > > > > If Bitcoin Core worked but 8333 was blocked I would not be > emailing the list. Bitcoin Core was crippled and unusable due to the AT&T > settings, and they tried hard to get me to buy monthly subscriptions to get the > answer. This makes it likely that Bitcoin Core is unusable for most AT&T > customers and other ISPs, hence the massive node decline. I'm sure this disrupts > alot of other people besides Bitcoiners too, hence the monthly subscriptions > geared towards people who can't figure out their connection situation. > > > > > AT&T literally blocked access to static IP if you don't buy one, so it wasn't a > normal network setup. Unfortunately the same security used to stop hackers and > viruses stops Bitcoin too, so this is probably the settings for almost every > router in the country. Nodes are in fact declining worldwide, down 15% in the > past year alone. Community needs to speak up and also educate before this gets > completely out of control. https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/dashboard/?days=365 6,000 > nodes is pathetic as it is and it's constantly declining. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. 2015-09-02 19:21 ` Matt Whitlock @ 2015-09-02 20:31 ` hurricanewarn1 2015-09-04 9:55 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email hurricanewarn1 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-02 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitcoin-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4718 bytes --] When you assume you make an ass out of you and me. That page doesn't even exist in my router, I don't have 2wire. The router I have is the one everyone is getting from uverse. Literally everything you said is incorrect. It is completely on topic as it pertains to Bitcoin Core functionality, 42 connections is nothing, and that's not how you fix it. If you're gonna call me out for being wrong at least be correct! I spent a lot of time fixing this and the info is useful cause this problem happens to a lot of people, so why obfuscate it with this nonsense. AT&T u-verse as it is now is near impossible for bitcoin nodes, 42 in the world is absolutely pathetic considering they are among the top 2 ISPs in the USA. Thanks for proving my point. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name> To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com> Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> Sent: Wed, Sep 2, 2015 3:21 pm Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. I've been trying to keep our discussion off-list because it is off-topic, but you keep adding the list back on in your replies. http://steamforge.net/wiki/images/2/29/Settings-Firewall-Advanced.png Settings > Firewall > Advanced Configuration > Outbound Protocol Control > All Other Protocols That's all you had to do. On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 9:44 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev wrote: > 42 in the whole world, and I'm one of them. Clearly that is a problem, do you even know about AT&T or are you in another country? Cause that statement is utterly ridiculous given the fact there are hundreds of millions of people using AT&T. I was simply sharing my knowledge on this issue since it poses a threat to the health of the bitcoin network, no need for personal attacks. > > None of my accusations were false, there is a firewall in the DVR that is uncontrolled and all ports are blocked via private subnets and no fixed public IP allowed unless you pay. I confirmed every one of these details with AT&T technicians or I wouldn't be saying them. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name> > To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com> > Sent: Wed, Sep 2, 2015 5:34 am > Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. > > > According to BitNodes, 42 Bitcoin nodes are running on AT&T's > network: > > https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/?q=AT%26T > > So I'm thinking > there's nothing wrong with AT&T's default network configuration. > > Frankly, the > things you've been writing strongly suggest that you aren't very knowledgeable > about computer networking. Instead of jumping right into making wild accusations > about AT&T, you probably should find someone knowledgeable to verify your > claims. > > > On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 5:20 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > First off I couldn't synch the wallet, it said no block source > available and there was zero connections. Bitcoin was literally getting thottled > every second. It would not even allow the connection to get block source. EVERY > port was blocked, making exceptions in the router firewall did nothing. I was > forced to use Blockchain.info which is a major security risk. > > > > Secondly, I > am developing a program using Bitcoin Python modules, so I login to my computer > like it's a server and it was flat out rejecting the connection. I could not run > any code until this got fixed, and of course needed the block source to even do > anything. > > > > If Bitcoin Core worked but 8333 was blocked I would not be > emailing the list. Bitcoin Core was crippled and unusable due to the AT&T > settings, and they tried hard to get me to buy monthly subscriptions to get the > answer. This makes it likely that Bitcoin Core is unusable for most AT&T > customers and other ISPs, hence the massive node decline. I'm sure this disrupts > alot of other people besides Bitcoiners too, hence the monthly subscriptions > geared towards people who can't figure out their connection situation. > > > > > AT&T literally blocked access to static IP if you don't buy one, so it wasn't a > normal network setup. Unfortunately the same security used to stop hackers and > viruses stops Bitcoin too, so this is probably the settings for almost every > router in the country. Nodes are in fact declining worldwide, down 15% in the > past year alone. Community needs to speak up and also educate before this gets > completely out of control. https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/dashboard/?days=365 6,000 > nodes is pathetic as it is and it's constantly declining. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5898 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email 2015-09-02 19:21 ` Matt Whitlock 2015-09-02 20:31 ` hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-04 9:55 ` hurricanewarn1 2015-09-04 13:47 ` Bastiaan van den Berg 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-04 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitcoin-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3223 bytes --] I sent out an email after 48 hours of dealing with trying to open up my ports for Bitcoin, I was quite frustrated and angry since I had to call like 10 times and I was making zero progress. Most of the AT&T people didn't give me any helpful clues on how to fix the situation. The original email described how there is a firewall in the DVR, and I thought it was blocking the ports. It is true there is a uncontrollable firewall in the DVR, it is false this blocks 8333. The actual problem is due to AT&T Uverse customers being forced to use a private dynamic IP, the IP is literally hidden from the internet, so it isn't possible to send any requests at it. It will literally ignore pings across all ports. So the solution is to switch to public static IP and make sure you allow incoming traffic. It's not so simple though, AT&T will not let you have a public static IP without paying. I've had my router reset 10 times today by AT&T (probably automatically) and it comes back with a private dynamic IP. Then I have to reset it to use public IP and that lasts less than an hour. It literally went from open to closed while typing this email... the IP address went from public to private dynamic. https://i.gyazo.com/3c732687fc3d21acb7d62f6d0e23a346.png This is making using Bitcoin Core almost impossible. I'm at least getting some synch now but maybe a few days of blocks the entire day, cause I can't sit here all day with the computer and keep fixing it. The proof is in the pudding, there are 37 nodes using AT&T in the ENTIRE world. AT&T is a massive ISP so this is strong evidence that using Bitcoin Core as a full node on AT&T is extremely difficult and actually just about impossible. https://i.gyazo.com/90beebe056f5fc338165e8d200536c06.png The other big ISPs have pathetic numbers also due to the same sort've things that AT&T does, but at least Comcast has 400 nodes. AT&T is much harder to use than any other ISP I've dealt with when it comes to Bitcoin Core. I apologize for sending out the wrong info the first time, although it is still worth noting the DVR firewall is out of your control, which might be a problem if not now then in the future. In any case AT&T has effectively blocked full nodes for Bitcoin Core via the private subnet, and the disability to change it to public without paying $15 more per month, and buying a $15 connection service so they will give you that info (if you dont pay the connection 'specialists' hang up on you). It is important to note this is not Bitcoin specific, but effects every program that depends on freely open ports. I don't think AT&T has anything against Bitcoin, it's just their security settings and policies have disabled Bitcoin Core for most customers. Also important to note this isn't a problem specific to AT&T, all the big ISPs are doing similar things. I believe the changes in ISP protocol are the main driving force behind the massive decline in Bitcoin nodes. Another big factor is firewalls, most people can't even remove the firewalls enough to open ports at will. The community needs to educate people on how to use Bitcoin Core when facing these intensifying security measures, or the decline of node numbers will continue. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3761 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email 2015-09-04 9:55 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-04 13:47 ` Bastiaan van den Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Bastiaan van den Berg @ 2015-09-04 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitcoin-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 291 bytes --] On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Zach G via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > It's not so simple though, AT&T will not let you have a public static IP > without paying. Not sure, but, what part of bitcoin development are you addressing in this email? -- buZz [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 731 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2156992.EaWDNESINK@crushinator>]
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. [not found] <2156992.EaWDNESINK@crushinator> @ 2015-09-02 9:20 ` hurricanewarn1 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-02 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitcoin-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12397 bytes --] First off I couldn't synch the wallet, it said no block source available and there was zero connections. Bitcoin was literally getting thottled every second. It would not even allow the connection to get block source. EVERY port was blocked, making exceptions in the router firewall did nothing. I was forced to use Blockchain.info which is a major security risk. Secondly, I am developing a program using Bitcoin Python modules, so I login to my computer like it's a server and it was flat out rejecting the connection. I could not run any code until this got fixed, and of course needed the block source to even do anything. If Bitcoin Core worked but 8333 was blocked I would not be emailing the list. Bitcoin Core was crippled and unusable due to the AT&T settings, and they tried hard to get me to buy monthly subscriptions to get the answer. This makes it likely that Bitcoin Core is unusable for most AT&T customers and other ISPs, hence the massive node decline. I'm sure this disrupts alot of other people besides Bitcoiners too, hence the monthly subscriptions geared towards people who can't figure out their connection situation. AT&T literally blocked access to static IP if you don't buy one, so it wasn't a normal network setup. Unfortunately the same security used to stop hackers and viruses stops Bitcoin too, so this is probably the settings for almost every router in the country. Nodes are in fact declining worldwide, down 15% in the past year alone. Community needs to speak up and also educate before this gets completely out of control. https://getaddr.bitnodes.io/dashboard/?days=365 6,000 nodes is pathetic as it is and it's constantly declining. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name> To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com> Sent: Wed, Sep 2, 2015 4:32 am Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. Respectfully, what the heck are you talking about? Practically every home LAN runs on a private subnet. My own desktop computer has the IP address 192.168.1.34, which is in a private subnet. This doesn't prevent my Bitcoin Core node from making outbound connections to other nodes. Moreover, almost all home Internet connections in the world run on dynamically assigned IP addresses. Again, this does not cause any problems for connecting outbound to other Bitcoin nodes. It's true that your node can't accept incoming connections unless you forward port 8333 on your router to your computer, but you don't need to be able to accept incoming connections to participate in the Bitcoin network. On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 3:20 am, Zach G via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > I was about to buy a VPS for Bitcoin, but I really do need Bitcoin Core for business reasons so I didn't give up. I once again thoroughly went through my computer and made sure there was nothing blocking 8333, a couple useful tools are CurrPorts and TCPView. I went through the router to make sure there was no block of port 8333. I researched everything thoroughly and was sure these were the right settings, but Bitcoin was still getting throttled every second and stuck in sys_sent, and python kept saying the target was rejecting the connection. > > I finally stumbled upon subnet settings, and saw that I had a private subnet, one of the few IPs that are private on earth ( https://www.arin.net/knowledge/address_filters.html ). Uverse put all their customers on a private subnet by default. This made my computer not only hidden but unroutable for any computer on the Bitcoin network. That alone is enough to totally stop Bitcoin connections on any port, but they made it even crazier by generating a dynamic IP that changes all the time, so public IP was meaningless for my computer. > > I switched over to a public subnet, and right there was a checkbox to allow incoming connections. My static IP showed for a minute then became dynamic/hidden again without me even touching anything. The final roadblock was AT&T charges $15-30/month for a public static IP, which is obviously insane and actually one could argue that violates their own terms of service. So the router was still ignoring my public IP settings simply because I wasn't paying for a public IP, and intentionally changing the settings back. I asked for a free public IP and there was no response for awhile. > > I found this article on cryptocoinnews while working out: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/isps-intentionally-blocking-bitcoin/ It's based on the first email I sent, and was displayed prominently on their front page. I posted a tweet publicly about it which referenced AT&T ( https://twitter.com/turtlehurricane/status/638930065980551168 ) and believe it or not I had a static public IP and port 8333 was open about 1 minute later. I don't know if it was a coincidence cause I already messaged them to please do that an hour before, or if that article and tweet spurred them to action. The timing was so ridiculous I think it's the latter. Without twitter I probably wouldn't have succeeded, the technicians on twitter actually answered all my questions 24/7 unlike phone technicians which were clueless and trying to sell me a subscription for connection services help. And shout out to cryptocoinnews for making this public. > > So to clarify, it appears AT&T has not blocked port 8333 itself, but rather effectively blocked all ports via the private subnet, which makes the computer hidden and unroutable for incoming peers. Although this severely limits functionality and cripples the ability to run a full node and many other programs it is understandable, since it just about 100% prevents hackers from getting in, since they can't even see your computer. What isn't understandable is that AT&T technicians did not inform me about this until I changed the settings myself, despite the fact it is a very obvious cause of ports being blocked. It's probably just ignorance since AT&T has so many complex network settings it's hard to keep track of, although I have a suspicion that someone in their command chain is withholding information in an attempt to make them buy a $15/month connection service, and once they buy that another $15-30/month is needed to get the static IP. > > As far as I know there is no easy to find info on the internet about private subnets crippling the ability to use Bitcoin. I believe this needs to be explicitly said in instructions for running a full node, maybe it wasn't a problem in 2009 but now it is a major issue. On default settings Bitcoin is 100% blocked, and most people do not have the time or motivation to fix this. I talked to at least 10 AT&T technicians and worked on it 2-3 days straight, did not receive the right answer until I found it myself, although they certainly gave me some useful clues about how the network works. > > I am very happy that AT&T fixed it, since other ISPs like Comcast appeared even worse. I openly talked with them about Bitcoin and they showed no prejudice, might've actually made them more willing to help me cause otherwise they would think I'm a hacker. > > tl;dr The good news is anyone with AT&T can be a full node by getting a public static IP, the bad news is almost no one will figure this out unless we as a community make it well known. I guarantee node numbers will improve if this information is spread to everyone. Database size and computing expenditures is simply not the reason people don't run full nodes, it's because their ISP has made it just about impossible without shelling out nearly 100% more money per month. If you don't pay the fee AT&T would never tell you about the private subnet, at least based on my experience. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup•net> > To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com>; bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> > Sent: Tue, Sep 1, 2015 3:16 am > Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in the cable box > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Another note on this subject > to add to the stuff people have already > mentioned... > > If you have the AT&T > landline but don't use AT&T's standard internet / > tv (what they call Uverse) > offering - that is, if you prefer to use > some local internet provider - you are > probably better off (in terms > of avoiding not only this sort of > blockage/censorship but as well, > potentially getting a better privacy policy > that isn't going to be > like AT&T's long-term data retention). You can check > directly with > the various local small ISPs to see what their policies > are > specifically on ports and whatnot. > > Ideally your ISP should let > you: > > port forward to SOMEPORTNUMBER for tcp and udp > > (above may or may not > be helpful for some if you are using > decentralized markets) > > have port 8333 > open > > (above is for bitcoin of course) > > Supposing you have FTTN because you > are paying a local ISP for > internet service, and that local ISP has contracted > with AT&T to be > able to provide service in an area where old-style DSL has been > phased > out, thus your local ISP is essentially providing you AT&T FTTN. > (FTTN > is Fiber to the Node, FTTN-BP is FTTN Bonded Pair). Even if a > local ISP has > its own privacy policy posted which is different from > AT&T, everything is > subject to AT&T data retention because the FTTN. > So get yourself a VPN (or set > up your own) for your connection. Tor > will run through the VPN. > > General > observations - TWC stores your IP and other stuffs for 6 > months or longer. > Same for Comcast. Verizon retains your stuffs for > 18 month minimum, probably > longer though. Qwest/Century, 1 year. > Cox, 6 months. AT&T retains for longer > than a year. This is just > what they are telling you, the reality is it's > probably longer due to > stuff like > this: > https://www.lawfareblog.com/odni-and-doj-release-last-section-215-collec > tion-order > > > > > > > > > > Zach > G via bitcoin-dev: > > I have been struggling to get port 8333 open all year, I > gave up > > and was using blockchain for months despite a strong desire to > stay > > on Bitcoin Core, but now the issue has reached critical mass since > > > I'm using the python Bitcoin server module. I have literally spent > > my entire > day trying to open 8333, I thoroughly made sure it was > > open on the router and > computer and it's still closed. Strangely > > enough I got it open for 30 seconds > once today but something closed > > it immediately. > > > > After hours of phone > calls and messaging AT&T finally told me the > > truth of what was going on, and > only because I noticed it myself > > and demanded an answer. The internet is > being routed through a > > DVR/cable box, and they confirmed the DVR also has a > firewall. To > > make this even more absurd they refused to turn the firewall > off > > because it is their equipment. So effectively they can firewall any > > > port they want even if the customer asks them not to, in the > > unlikely event > the customer figures it out. > > > > Perhaps this is the driving force behind the > inexplicable and > > massive decline in Bitcoin nodes. Bitcoin is being censored > by the > > ISPs themselves, and they won't even tell you that. I had to get in > > > touch with headquarters and threaten to rip it out of the wall to > > get a > proper answer. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing > > list bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > > - -- > > http://abis.io ~ > "a protocol concept to enable decentralization > and > expansion of a giving economy, and a new social > good" > https://keybase.io/odinn > -----BEGIN PGP > SIGNATURE----- > > iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV5VDeAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CvkIH/jy4Vo+My3xeBdvFQmxkJWyQ > U5mv2zWEvBYw71Xy1EDzQY1AhEBmatUU1eu2AbOqXdUR4511FxCNzFmTxy6roEiz > EehBkvXNbBCbEzLRisjxuQw34OKM+xfieCqE1mzJok2uSdLMMQLcbWL1/k3/OmS5 > 9O9z/wMXqU1Jc19MTK+vF1Lz5ilnRn3hEbTaCN3ivYnYFa0DpBH9r0Y07UcoJ6Wr > ui/x0sSSuupAGzOkZ75HQ8yeQXckeAu6TB3/jE8QEqNUmAJkmR8eK4ofXZWFrIjy > mOKeQL4c+jRQnTR8pt+y89g2QIpzFoHaV5T+WvQuC1t8xNOrxLgYFXWgl0dhoYE= > =UCLC > -----END > PGP SIGNATURE----- > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 15022 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in the cable box
@ 2015-09-01 7:16 odinn
2015-09-02 7:20 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets hurricanewarn1
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: odinn @ 2015-09-01 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hurricanewarn1, bitcoin-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Another note on this subject to add to the stuff people have already
mentioned...
If you have the AT&T landline but don't use AT&T's standard internet /
tv (what they call Uverse) offering - that is, if you prefer to use
some local internet provider - you are probably better off (in terms
of avoiding not only this sort of blockage/censorship but as well,
potentially getting a better privacy policy that isn't going to be
like AT&T's long-term data retention). You can check directly with
the various local small ISPs to see what their policies are
specifically on ports and whatnot.
Ideally your ISP should let you:
port forward to SOMEPORTNUMBER for tcp and udp
(above may or may not be helpful for some if you are using
decentralized markets)
have port 8333 open
(above is for bitcoin of course)
Supposing you have FTTN because you are paying a local ISP for
internet service, and that local ISP has contracted with AT&T to be
able to provide service in an area where old-style DSL has been phased
out, thus your local ISP is essentially providing you AT&T FTTN.
(FTTN is Fiber to the Node, FTTN-BP is FTTN Bonded Pair). Even if a
local ISP has its own privacy policy posted which is different from
AT&T, everything is subject to AT&T data retention because the FTTN.
So get yourself a VPN (or set up your own) for your connection. Tor
will run through the VPN.
General observations - TWC stores your IP and other stuffs for 6
months or longer. Same for Comcast. Verizon retains your stuffs for
18 month minimum, probably longer though. Qwest/Century, 1 year.
Cox, 6 months. AT&T retains for longer than a year. This is just
what they are telling you, the reality is it's probably longer due to
stuff like this:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/odni-and-doj-release-last-section-215-collec
tion-order
Zach G via bitcoin-dev:
> I have been struggling to get port 8333 open all year, I gave up
> and was using blockchain for months despite a strong desire to stay
> on Bitcoin Core, but now the issue has reached critical mass since
> I'm using the python Bitcoin server module. I have literally spent
> my entire day trying to open 8333, I thoroughly made sure it was
> open on the router and computer and it's still closed. Strangely
> enough I got it open for 30 seconds once today but something closed
> it immediately.
>
> After hours of phone calls and messaging AT&T finally told me the
> truth of what was going on, and only because I noticed it myself
> and demanded an answer. The internet is being routed through a
> DVR/cable box, and they confirmed the DVR also has a firewall. To
> make this even more absurd they refused to turn the firewall off
> because it is their equipment. So effectively they can firewall any
> port they want even if the customer asks them not to, in the
> unlikely event the customer figures it out.
>
> Perhaps this is the driving force behind the inexplicable and
> massive decline in Bitcoin nodes. Bitcoin is being censored by the
> ISPs themselves, and they won't even tell you that. I had to get in
> touch with headquarters and threaten to rip it out of the wall to
> get a proper answer.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
> list bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
- --
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV5VDeAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CvkIH/jy4Vo+My3xeBdvFQmxkJWyQ
U5mv2zWEvBYw71Xy1EDzQY1AhEBmatUU1eu2AbOqXdUR4511FxCNzFmTxy6roEiz
EehBkvXNbBCbEzLRisjxuQw34OKM+xfieCqE1mzJok2uSdLMMQLcbWL1/k3/OmS5
9O9z/wMXqU1Jc19MTK+vF1Lz5ilnRn3hEbTaCN3ivYnYFa0DpBH9r0Y07UcoJ6Wr
ui/x0sSSuupAGzOkZ75HQ8yeQXckeAu6TB3/jE8QEqNUmAJkmR8eK4ofXZWFrIjy
mOKeQL4c+jRQnTR8pt+y89g2QIpzFoHaV5T+WvQuC1t8xNOrxLgYFXWgl0dhoYE=
=UCLC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets. 2015-09-01 7:16 [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in the cable box odinn @ 2015-09-02 7:20 ` hurricanewarn1 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: hurricanewarn1 @ 2015-09-02 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitcoin-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9341 bytes --] I was about to buy a VPS for Bitcoin, but I really do need Bitcoin Core for business reasons so I didn't give up. I once again thoroughly went through my computer and made sure there was nothing blocking 8333, a couple useful tools are CurrPorts and TCPView. I went through the router to make sure there was no block of port 8333. I researched everything thoroughly and was sure these were the right settings, but Bitcoin was still getting throttled every second and stuck in sys_sent, and python kept saying the target was rejecting the connection. I finally stumbled upon subnet settings, and saw that I had a private subnet, one of the few IPs that are private on earth ( https://www.arin.net/knowledge/address_filters.html ). Uverse put all their customers on a private subnet by default. This made my computer not only hidden but unroutable for any computer on the Bitcoin network. That alone is enough to totally stop Bitcoin connections on any port, but they made it even crazier by generating a dynamic IP that changes all the time, so public IP was meaningless for my computer. I switched over to a public subnet, and right there was a checkbox to allow incoming connections. My static IP showed for a minute then became dynamic/hidden again without me even touching anything. The final roadblock was AT&T charges $15-30/month for a public static IP, which is obviously insane and actually one could argue that violates their own terms of service. So the router was still ignoring my public IP settings simply because I wasn't paying for a public IP, and intentionally changing the settings back. I asked for a free public IP and there was no response for awhile. I found this article on cryptocoinnews while working out: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/isps-intentionally-blocking-bitcoin/ It's based on the first email I sent, and was displayed prominently on their front page. I posted a tweet publicly about it which referenced AT&T ( https://twitter.com/turtlehurricane/status/638930065980551168 ) and believe it or not I had a static public IP and port 8333 was open about 1 minute later. I don't know if it was a coincidence cause I already messaged them to please do that an hour before, or if that article and tweet spurred them to action. The timing was so ridiculous I think it's the latter. Without twitter I probably wouldn't have succeeded, the technicians on twitter actually answered all my questions 24/7 unlike phone technicians which were clueless and trying to sell me a subscription for connection services help. And shout out to cryptocoinnews for making this public. So to clarify, it appears AT&T has not blocked port 8333 itself, but rather effectively blocked all ports via the private subnet, which makes the computer hidden and unroutable for incoming peers. Although this severely limits functionality and cripples the ability to run a full node and many other programs it is understandable, since it just about 100% prevents hackers from getting in, since they can't even see your computer. What isn't understandable is that AT&T technicians did not inform me about this until I changed the settings myself, despite the fact it is a very obvious cause of ports being blocked. It's probably just ignorance since AT&T has so many complex network settings it's hard to keep track of, although I have a suspicion that someone in their command chain is withholding information in an attempt to make them buy a $15/month connection service, and once they buy that another $15-30/month is needed to get the static IP. As far as I know there is no easy to find info on the internet about private subnets crippling the ability to use Bitcoin. I believe this needs to be explicitly said in instructions for running a full node, maybe it wasn't a problem in 2009 but now it is a major issue. On default settings Bitcoin is 100% blocked, and most people do not have the time or motivation to fix this. I talked to at least 10 AT&T technicians and worked on it 2-3 days straight, did not receive the right answer until I found it myself, although they certainly gave me some useful clues about how the network works. I am very happy that AT&T fixed it, since other ISPs like Comcast appeared even worse. I openly talked with them about Bitcoin and they showed no prejudice, might've actually made them more willing to help me cause otherwise they would think I'm a hacker. tl;dr The good news is anyone with AT&T can be a full node by getting a public static IP, the bad news is almost no one will figure this out unless we as a community make it well known. I guarantee node numbers will improve if this information is spread to everyone. Database size and computing expenditures is simply not the reason people don't run full nodes, it's because their ISP has made it just about impossible without shelling out nearly 100% more money per month. If you don't pay the fee AT&T would never tell you about the private subnet, at least based on my experience. -----Original Message----- From: odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup•net> To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewarn1@aol•com>; bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> Sent: Tue, Sep 1, 2015 3:16 am Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in the cable box -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Another note on this subject to add to the stuff people have already mentioned... If you have the AT&T landline but don't use AT&T's standard internet / tv (what they call Uverse) offering - that is, if you prefer to use some local internet provider - you are probably better off (in terms of avoiding not only this sort of blockage/censorship but as well, potentially getting a better privacy policy that isn't going to be like AT&T's long-term data retention). You can check directly with the various local small ISPs to see what their policies are specifically on ports and whatnot. Ideally your ISP should let you: port forward to SOMEPORTNUMBER for tcp and udp (above may or may not be helpful for some if you are using decentralized markets) have port 8333 open (above is for bitcoin of course) Supposing you have FTTN because you are paying a local ISP for internet service, and that local ISP has contracted with AT&T to be able to provide service in an area where old-style DSL has been phased out, thus your local ISP is essentially providing you AT&T FTTN. (FTTN is Fiber to the Node, FTTN-BP is FTTN Bonded Pair). Even if a local ISP has its own privacy policy posted which is different from AT&T, everything is subject to AT&T data retention because the FTTN. So get yourself a VPN (or set up your own) for your connection. Tor will run through the VPN. General observations - TWC stores your IP and other stuffs for 6 months or longer. Same for Comcast. Verizon retains your stuffs for 18 month minimum, probably longer though. Qwest/Century, 1 year. Cox, 6 months. AT&T retains for longer than a year. This is just what they are telling you, the reality is it's probably longer due to stuff like this: https://www.lawfareblog.com/odni-and-doj-release-last-section-215-collec tion-order Zach G via bitcoin-dev: > I have been struggling to get port 8333 open all year, I gave up > and was using blockchain for months despite a strong desire to stay > on Bitcoin Core, but now the issue has reached critical mass since > I'm using the python Bitcoin server module. I have literally spent > my entire day trying to open 8333, I thoroughly made sure it was > open on the router and computer and it's still closed. Strangely > enough I got it open for 30 seconds once today but something closed > it immediately. > > After hours of phone calls and messaging AT&T finally told me the > truth of what was going on, and only because I noticed it myself > and demanded an answer. The internet is being routed through a > DVR/cable box, and they confirmed the DVR also has a firewall. To > make this even more absurd they refused to turn the firewall off > because it is their equipment. So effectively they can firewall any > port they want even if the customer asks them not to, in the > unlikely event the customer figures it out. > > Perhaps this is the driving force behind the inexplicable and > massive decline in Bitcoin nodes. Bitcoin is being censored by the > ISPs themselves, and they won't even tell you that. I had to get in > touch with headquarters and threaten to rip it out of the wall to > get a proper answer. > > > > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing > list bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > - -- http://abis.io ~ "a protocol concept to enable decentralization and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good" https://keybase.io/odinn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV5VDeAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CvkIH/jy4Vo+My3xeBdvFQmxkJWyQ U5mv2zWEvBYw71Xy1EDzQY1AhEBmatUU1eu2AbOqXdUR4511FxCNzFmTxy6roEiz EehBkvXNbBCbEzLRisjxuQw34OKM+xfieCqE1mzJok2uSdLMMQLcbWL1/k3/OmS5 9O9z/wMXqU1Jc19MTK+vF1Lz5ilnRn3hEbTaCN3ivYnYFa0DpBH9r0Y07UcoJ6Wr ui/x0sSSuupAGzOkZ75HQ8yeQXckeAu6TB3/jE8QEqNUmAJkmR8eK4ofXZWFrIjy mOKeQL4c+jRQnTR8pt+y89g2QIpzFoHaV5T+WvQuC1t8xNOrxLgYFXWgl0dhoYE= =UCLC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10435 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-04 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1954364.4gG0cHmrlB@crushinator>
2015-09-02 13:44 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets hurricanewarn1
2015-09-02 19:21 ` Matt Whitlock
2015-09-02 20:31 ` hurricanewarn1
2015-09-04 9:55 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T/ISPs making Bitcoin Core near impossible to use as a full node via hidden private dynamic IPs, not by specifically blocking 8333 or Bitcoin as stated in original email hurricanewarn1
2015-09-04 13:47 ` Bastiaan van den Berg
[not found] <2156992.EaWDNESINK@crushinator>
2015-09-02 9:20 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets hurricanewarn1
2015-09-01 7:16 [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes by closing port 8333 via a hidden firewall in the cable box odinn
2015-09-02 7:20 ` [bitcoin-dev] AT&T has effectively banned Bitcoin nodes via utilizing private subnets hurricanewarn1
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox