Subject: [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet?

From: Weikeng Chen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 20:38:03 -0700 (PDT)

I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be 
added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a 
lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, 
CSFS isn't.

With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to 
start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM 
by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential 
on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying 
on CTV + CSFS to develop further.

Thanks,
Weikeng

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email-masked].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.