Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in 2-of-3 transaction signing in Bitcoind?

From: Matt Whitlock <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:22:17 -0400

Thanks for the quick reply to both of you, Mike and Pieter.

I feel foolish for posting to this list, because the debug.log does indeed say "inputs already spent." That's so weird, though, because we haven't been able to get anything to accept the transaction, seemingly, and yet it was accepted into the block chain 15 blocks ago.

Anyway, I'm sorry for the noise.

On Tuesday, 15 April 2014, at 5:11 pm, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> The first input seems to be already spent by another transaction
> (which looks very similar).
> 
> 0.9 should report a more detailed reason for rejection, by the way.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Mike Hearn <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > Check debug.log to find out the reason it was rejected.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bitcoin-development mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> >