public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt•org>
To: Joost Jager <joost.jager@gmail•com>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
	<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Standardisation of an unstructured taproot annex
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 15:08:01 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29ff546a6007cec1a0f85b91541f8e4d@dtrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJBJmV-L4FusaMNV=_7L39QFDKnPKK_Z1QE6YU-wp2ZLjc=RrQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2023-06-02 05:00, Joost Jager via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> the benefits of making the annex available in a
> non-structured form are both evident and immediate. By allowing
> developers to utilize the taproot annex without delay, we can take
> advantage of its features today,

Hi Joost,

Out of curiosity, what features and benefits are available today?  I 
know Greg Sanders wants to use annex data with LN-Symmetry[1], but 
that's dependent on a soft fork of SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT.  I also heard you 
mention that it could allow putting arbitrary data into a witness 
without having to commit to that data beforehand, but that would only 
increase the efficiency of witness stuffing like ordinal inscriptions by 
only 0.4% (~2 bytes saved per 520 bytes pushed) and it'd still be 
required to create an output in order to spend it.

Is there some other way to use the annex today that would be beneficial 
to users of Bitcoin?

-Dave

[1] 
https://github.com/lightning/bolts/compare/master...instagibbs:bolts:eltoo_draft#diff-156a655274046c49e6b1c2a22546ed66366d3b8d97b8e9b34b45fe5bd8800ae2R119


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-03  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-02 15:00 Joost Jager
2023-06-03  1:08 ` David A. Harding [this message]
2023-06-03  1:14   ` Greg Sanders
2023-06-03  9:14     ` Joost Jager
2023-06-03 15:50       ` Peter Todd
2023-06-15  9:36     ` Joost Jager
2023-06-15 10:39       ` Greg Sanders
2023-06-16 11:26         ` Joost Jager
2023-06-16 13:30           ` Greg Sanders
2023-06-18 20:32             ` Antoine Riard
2023-06-18 20:40               ` Greg Sanders
2023-06-19  1:14                 ` Antoine Riard
2023-06-20 12:50               ` Joost Jager
2023-06-03  7:49   ` Joost Jager
2023-06-03  8:06     ` Joost Jager
2023-06-03 12:05       ` Greg Sanders
2023-06-03 12:35         ` Joost Jager
2023-06-03 12:43           ` Greg Sanders
2023-06-03 12:55             ` Joost Jager
2023-06-08  9:16 ` Joost Jager
2023-06-10  0:23 ` Antoine Riard
2023-06-10  7:43   ` Joost Jager
2023-06-10 22:09     ` David A. Harding
2023-06-11 19:25       ` Joost Jager
2023-06-12  3:16         ` Antoine Riard
2023-06-13  8:51         ` David A. Harding
2023-06-13 10:38           ` Joost Jager
2023-06-12 13:03     ` Greg Sanders
2023-06-20 12:30     ` Joost Jager
2023-07-04 20:18       ` Antoine Riard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29ff546a6007cec1a0f85b91541f8e4d@dtrt.org \
    --to=dave@dtrt$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joost.jager@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox