public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elias Rohrer <btcdevml@tnull•de>
To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail•com>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
	<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BGP hijacking on Bitcoin p2p network
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:44:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31411E6C-B1BF-45B7-848A-0AC8ECDFFCB3@tnull.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dEY4dMW9awXrHkDOv-V7OSpjaPXHONVAaCSQ63gq1lQN0jWqJfeSoB4zlAwTn5I7J2L_YmzwcL_O6SbY9MBPnG845D8wmkauQzXeaD7VykA=@protonmail.com>

Hi alicexbt,

Routing attacks have actually been studied quite a bit in literature.

You may be interested in the research articles of Maria Apostolaki et al.[1,2], Muoi Tran et al.[3], and related works.

Best,

Elias

[1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.07524.pdf
[2]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.06254.pdf
[3]: https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/tran2020stealthier.pdf

On 9 Jun 2022, at 20:24, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:

> Hi Bitcoin Developers,
>
> Based on this [answer][1] from 2014, bitcoin nodes are vulnerable to BGP hijacking. There was an incident in March 2022, twitter prefix was hijacked and details are shared in 2 blog posts:
>
> https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/28488
>
> https://www.manrs.org/2022/03/lesson-learned-twitter-shored-up-its-routing-security/
>
> 'nusenu' had written an article about Tor network being vulnerable to BGP hijacking attacks: https://nusenu.medium.com/how-vulnerable-is-the-tor-network-to-bgp-hijacking-attacks-56d3b2ebfd92
>
> After doing some research I found that RPKI ROA and BGP prefix length can help against BGP hijacking attacks. I checked BGP prefix length and RPKI ROA for first 10 IP addresses returned in `getnodeaddresses` in bitcoin core and it had vulnerable results.
>
> https://i.stack.imgur.com/KD7jH.png
>
> Has anyone written a detailed blog post or research article like nusenu? If not I would be interested to write one in next couple of weeks?
> Looking for some "technical" feedback, links if this was already discussed in past with some solutions.
>
>   [1]: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/30305/133407
>
>
> /dev/fd0
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-10  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-09 18:24 alicexbt
2022-06-10  6:44 ` Elias Rohrer [this message]
2022-07-05 20:30   ` alicexbt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31411E6C-B1BF-45B7-848A-0AC8ECDFFCB3@tnull.de \
    --to=btcdevml@tnull$(echo .)de \
    --cc=alicexbt@protonmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox