> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Eric Voskuil : > > On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote: >>>> Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way >>> >>> This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ... >>> guarantee node ownership“). >> >> Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD. > > I'm always willing to debate this issue. I'm generally a little > suspicious of one who demands another person to stop arguing. I got at > least one such demand (along with a threat) on this subject privately > last summer from a notable Core dev. There is a lengthy thread on this > subject in which I raised these issues. Everyone is free to review that > discussion. What you did say in the sentence above (and I think is FUD) is, that BIP150 will lead to every node being identifiable. This is just completely wrong. There is nothing to say against a technical debate (and we had this), but I will ask you to stop if I see you attacking BIP150/151 at every occasion with FUDish arguments like this.