Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary

From: Thomas Zander <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:08:17 +0200

On Wednesday 29. July 2015 20.00.10 Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> And, of course, short term convenience for users is much more
> important than figuring out the long term viability of the system once
> the seigniorage (spent on the miner's subsidy) goes away.

There are various decades spanned in that sentence.  Your idea of "short term" 
is vastly different from mine.
-- 
Thomas Zander