public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wendell <w@grabhive•com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd•org>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] SPV bitcoind? (was: Introducing BitcoinKit.framework)
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:37:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB67FAF-E113-47FE-9043-C22D0F5A4F4A@grabhive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130717105853.GA10083@savin>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1698 bytes --]

Peter,

This sounds like a _very_ good idea for a desktop client, and probably acceptable to users so long as we take available disk space into consideration, and only ever use a fraction of it.

Will you implement this?

-wendell

grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive

On Jul 17, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Peter Todd wrote:

> So what's useful about that? Basically it means your node starts with
> the same security level, and usefulness to the network, as a SPV node.
> But over time you keep downloading blocks as they are created, and with
> whatever bandwidth you have left (out of some user-configurable
> allocation) you download additional blocks going further and further
> back in time. Gradually your UTXO set becomes more complete, and over
> time you can verify a higher and higher % of all valid transactions.
> Eventually your node becomes a full node, but in the meantime it was
> still useful for the user, and still contributed to the network by
> relaying blocks and an increasingly large subset of all transactions.
> (optionally you can store a subset of the chain history too for other
> nodes to bootstrap from) You've also got better security because you
> *are* validating blocks, starting off incompletely, and increasingly
> completely until your finally validating fully. Privacy is improved, for
> both you and others, by mixing your transactions with others and adding
> to the overall anonymity set.
> 
> In the future we'll have miners commit a hash of the UTXO set, and that
> gives us even more options to, for instance, have relayed transactions
> include proof that their inputs were valid, allowing all nodes to relay
> them safely.


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 841 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-15 10:07 [Bitcoin-development] Introducing BitcoinKit.framework Wendell
2013-07-15 13:19 ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-15 14:39   ` Wendell
2013-07-15 15:48     ` Mike Hearn
     [not found]       ` <3E7894A0-06F3-453D-87F8-975A244EBACF@include7.ch>
2013-07-15 20:08         ` Mike Hearn
     [not found]           ` <2BDA0943-22BB-4405-9AF0-86FB41FD04A6@include7.ch>
2013-07-16  9:21             ` Mike Hearn
     [not found]               ` <2F20A509-13A9-4C84-86D7-A15C21BACD53@include7.ch>
2013-07-16  9:51                 ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-16 10:17                   ` Wendell
2013-07-16 10:59                     ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-16 14:16                       ` [Bitcoin-development] SPV bitcoind? (was: Introducing BitcoinKit.framework) Wendell
2013-07-16 15:09                         ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-17 10:58                         ` Peter Todd
2013-07-17 12:29                           ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-17 14:32                             ` [Bitcoin-development] SPV bitcoind? Andreas Schildbach
2013-07-17 19:32                               ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-18 12:13                             ` [Bitcoin-development] SPV bitcoind? (was: Introducing BitcoinKit.framework) Peter Todd
2013-07-18 13:18                               ` Peter Todd
2013-07-18 13:38                               ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-17 13:37                           ` Wendell [this message]
2013-07-17 14:31                             ` Michael Gronager
2013-07-17 14:58                               ` Wendell
2013-07-17 19:33                                 ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-17 22:26                                   ` Michael Gronager
2013-07-17 23:04                                     ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-07-18  8:19                                     ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-18 11:40                                       ` Bazyli Zygan
2013-07-18 13:03                                         ` Michael Gronager
2013-07-18 13:16                                           ` Michael Gronager
2013-07-18 16:22                             ` Peter Todd
2013-07-18 16:46                               ` Wendell
2013-07-18 23:03                                 ` Peter Todd
2013-07-21 15:55                       ` [Bitcoin-development] Introducing BitcoinKit.framework Pieter Wuille
2013-07-21 17:20                         ` Mike Hearn
2013-07-22 13:08               ` Mike Hearn
     [not found] <mailman.108889.1374064174.4583.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
2013-07-17 12:37 ` [Bitcoin-development] SPV bitcoind? (was: Introducing BitcoinKit.framework) Tamas Blummer
2013-07-17 12:50   ` Peter Todd
2013-07-17 13:56   ` Mike Hearn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DB67FAF-E113-47FE-9043-C22D0F5A4F4A@grabhive.com \
    --to=w@grabhive$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pete@petertodd$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox