From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WI026-0002as-FM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:13:38 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WI024-0001s0-TJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:13:38 +0000 Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.0.101]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1WI01y-0002nK-An; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:13:30 +0100 From: Tamas Blummer Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:13:29 +0100 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1393265616; 52e7ead9; X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1WI024-0001s0-TJ Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:13:38 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2" --Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii It costs at least 5430 satoshis to create an output at the moment. Is the same spam limit applied if the script is OP_RETURN? If not, I would be concerned od opening a cheap spam. Tamas Blummer On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > And if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, and > more space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a future > version. > > Wladimir > --Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

It costs at least 5430 satoshis to create an output at the moment.

Is the same spam limit applied if the script is OP_RETURN?

If not, I would be concerned od opening a cheap spam.

Tamas Blummer

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:

And if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, and
more space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a future
version.

Wladimir

--Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2-- --Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTC4vJAAoJEPZykcUXcTkcd/0IAIWfRpiOA8kZycFgy3Etm8w0 YYqEOvlgZkrzZTsR+zPo8i2YCrllfu+v1/fl47FwiwWYqCDavsqnT91DMe0I1VAa Ed9egEj3QHISMymJt+epo2BQkxIojBpDD3XhL8kntop/5b7RPZMOPhnBiWL5vpkw 6isZrdr6iJdjuDQU75/336FVRhGNGRX8u2qspXdWqJASaCFwBL5XnDXn7fyQwpiw dp/OZafiWkU2T2SVgXFJqO2ROWOCfIdK6sMEaz5LTfO5tQthPZT/cyTrM6+vZ706 VYXQFZhlsTbgIGErYgwKe0Sur2ZYaygInyc1zARrywFuO73Y2Ni4ZnwVHDta7zk= =g7mc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WI483-00069c-Sh for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:36:03 +0000 Received: from mail-yh0-f50.google.com ([209.85.213.50]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WI482-00072R-LJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:36:03 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 29so6114354yhl.37 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CTchEv5JFWhH2U4fJcHsuyqstwPVhLXDISA68VVsYVM=; b=fgl3XaPnJvtzkZ8jhNT17mDogqqQ1GET0TrAdZ3xO8QYu1NtI1Lbx8I9GRJSRcEeFW QTMccktE6oQBVwqkEqBHyfLHIDCVZb4JKpsIu3xXoNqB2FDTnuB8S8SX1s+WlJ1KjjfL PPMOZUSsmkyC6VJ+XMeN91j++oSRsMe8nRXTgPma3EoRAlFR+JetVaRo/+TGcu51nNM7 ZQ/Xh4jAtdu9d0AvsBq0QOUCWBLWjID6hJWZLZxWSMOp2kCnE7s5QHrzJ+YuN+Ot5PXY FED0w5PKoPeRgiehoAM4hvb1SEWzo25/LBkBGyLlnSiF0IZcYm3Cms+9WZVvq+vZWo8R QIUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkazpbMSJmucYuTEqITC/HJA8392N+FnhXXPHz1h0Z63tE1RcAtX20OpPSkJIJXEtJAhn5 X-Received: by 10.236.88.75 with SMTP id z51mr1397269yhe.109.1393281357109; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.127.233] (108-193-6-130.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.193.6.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b24sm1929646yhl.25.2014.02.24.14.35.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <530BC94D.3030301@monetize.io> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:57 -0800 From: Mark Friedenbach Organization: Monetize.io Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com> In-Reply-To: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1WI482-00072R-LJ Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:36:04 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 OP_RETURN outputs are provably unspendable *and* not included in the UTXO set, so they're not dust (the client makes this check and handles TX_NULL_DATA outputs separately). On 02/24/2014 10:13 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote: > It costs at least 5430 satoshis to create an output at the moment. > Is the same spam limit applied if the script is OP_RETURN? If not, > I would be concerned od opening a cheap spam. > > Tamas Blummer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTC8lNAAoJEAdzVfsmodw4vpAP/1/wJFRq9x3rhETtUlS/3+F3 UrgBhfNDP7rq1P9wqZm20cssF0VcG+SVG94m/kH/H8cfJsjGB3/NW2IGxf9J6wOT vWiGqz4b7lkh5nywBe0TK0smkqMFtyNAESX1WdJpdNLAd5OK/wj2X7Dl3/r7K9tk SN1Oi4nlQD+GkbQBNeqf659BKlFAIYONl9SrPXvrEoSuTm0CjFLsST3Go3El0tyx rLrApXCAR+iGs9bZONdkC3rRWGGa3V8HLNeCyBaLA7dsipnk2kMsjbrLB9NZU54L Dz07e1oelFJErsbYKD+AQy3KiZ4+7dZRoi9FtPqlXtCGAObW0fi5Rm2HDzCG+iMU f+6xgCCyyP++fET/EnJj1Jxjrn6suoAl2hjZLpaGgJ67lsxq5rqmXetID5X+cGRU HX6Ar5+LIjRixfoCF3dJoZT0Ko1S0b58oRzyapwbB+2Fi0/G7ujEwErWE33ARXad vTYznlAXG5YzIrjAJUF3PG3MlbaX4TWywJxRCMRcTQC7Ak+dP2cdOBuzvLdAsYXG xcmqfl3ETH5xLxLWYnzNplTkt9ENs8UHrG0StWOyCg4+MG8yC/jPFp6qzRlAaZEv vFsIPGD+jzftrqBQ1GgjbG8bofUYCMnYRKQtQ377GNw8s8wVASb8CxyI8yhXKpdv zdCwIlvHM0A8CofmDDot =6Jux -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----