From: Daryl Tucker <daryl@daryltucker•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:54:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53402724.5060304@daryltucker.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJBm_0AX3MTWFvbNw1_GxXFTf_7wHv0GvkATUtz0v6wpsQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1091 bytes --]
YYYY-MM-DD sorts more naturally.
On 04/05/2014 06:28 AM, Wladimir wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock•name
> <mailto:bip@mattwhitlock•name>> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 5 April 2014, at 12:21 pm, Jorge Timón wrote:
> > I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY
> and YYYY-DD-MM.
>
> Your preferences reflect a cultural bias. The only entirely
> numeric date format that is unambiguous across all cultures is
> YYYY-MM-DD. (No culture uses YYYY-DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems
> to think so.)
>
>
> Let's not waste any time shed-painting this. I'd like to finish this
> discussion at once:
>
> https://xkcd.com/1179/
>
> Wladimir
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
Daryl Tucker
daryl@daryltucker•com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2861 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-05 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-01 19:00 Pieter Wuille
2014-04-01 19:04 ` Matt Whitlock
2014-04-01 20:59 ` Pieter Wuille
2014-04-04 3:41 ` kjj
2014-04-04 7:01 ` Wladimir
2014-04-04 13:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-04-05 10:21 ` Jorge Timón
2014-04-05 10:40 ` Matt Whitlock
2014-04-05 11:28 ` Jorge Timón
2014-04-05 11:28 ` Wladimir
2014-04-05 15:54 ` Daryl Tucker [this message]
2014-04-05 17:29 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-04-01 19:07 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-04-01 19:09 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-04-01 19:09 ` Mike Hearn
2014-04-01 19:11 ` Matt Corallo
2014-04-01 21:42 ` Jorge Timón
2014-04-01 19:12 ` Luke-Jr
2014-04-01 19:16 ` Benjamin Cordes
2014-04-01 19:19 ` Luke-Jr
2014-04-01 20:00 ` Peter Todd
2014-04-01 20:53 ` Pieter Wuille
2014-04-01 21:47 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-04-01 21:51 ` Daryl Banttari
2014-04-01 22:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-04-01 21:51 ` Matt Corallo
2014-04-01 22:37 ` Pieter Wuille
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53402724.5060304@daryltucker.com \
--to=daryl@daryltucker$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox