From: Jameson Lopp <jameson.lopp@gmail•com>
To: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Abusive and broken bitcoin seeders
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:59:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DA3DA5.1040102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2HHPUnsymDnRLd=-Ox-RD8RezM7TvpYeAw_np4JM4Bdw@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I may be able to provide some insight regarding request volume / abuse via my public node at http://statoshi.info
My node receives a 'getaddr' request about every 50 seconds: http://i.imgur.com/XEpnWfG.png
In terms of the 'addr' messages that it sends out, the volume is also low. This graph has 'inv' and 'tx' sent messages for comparison. http://i.imgur.com/keyitsS.png
Now, these are just message volume and not actual resource usage, but I have a feeling that 'getaddr' requests are not resource intensive since it shouldn't be reading from disk. I could look into adding timing metrics around these requests if you think it could be useful.
- - Jameson
On 07/31/2014 06:37 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>>
>> I suspect it is something that is going to have to be dealt with in the
>> future (I just don't know how yet).
>>
>
> The web has managed to survive despite constant fast crawls being the norm
> for the past 10 years or so. I wouldn't worry too much about this unless
> you can prove that a big chunk of your nodes resources are going to
> answering ver queries.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Infragistics Professional
> Build stunning WinForms apps today!
> Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
> Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT2j2lAAoJEIch3FSFNiDcWqIH/i0W21cYFHyQZItSkyHezBER
ExjudrLuXvTuRc/9b1OG7lJpK7IEYpCn0xXHGP3gv8gihq6lVEdZCFMXGWxU+eDv
ECXppTTCUkofUjVInbU91eagXeRzK0UTbTrp2++hfLQIAv99B8mgSdoEcopP42Fd
G197p/273lAPGVmNF31YPUcIbrhj0IzsiR1QaEEf1FEelaJ7MmU7YsUFUglajTqk
6+Uzcr6RcwLKAWVFAOA6VOeVwAMOQMwsniUAx6bYbqvgSHzRTllDDWW5rTaKh9+O
rIhA3LvHpLh37xqTs6EvJb2Kn823e4Ax4Eoz3wqVvAyjNqWHRPjlXdXentHFN4Q=
=R+Z1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-30 13:22 Jeff Garzik
2014-07-30 13:50 ` Wladimir
2014-07-30 13:57 ` Pieter Wuille
2014-07-30 21:03 ` Neil Fincham
2014-07-31 10:37 ` Mike Hearn
2014-07-31 12:59 ` Jameson Lopp [this message]
2014-07-30 22:53 ` Addy Yeow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53DA3DA5.1040102@gmail.com \
--to=jameson.lopp@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox