-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 09/26/2014 01:53 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Justus Ranvier
> <justus@monetas.net> wrote:
>> Two draft information BIPs are attached.
> 
> I've pinged some people privately but also pinging the list… no 
> commentary on this proposal?
> 

Regarding the BIP process itself, I rather think it's broken in the
case of informational BIPs.

Proposals that require explicit action on the part of others do not
logically belong in the same process as purely information proposals
that do not require any explicit action by others are going to be
carried out regardless.

The only reason we proposed these as BIPs at all was to support the
intent of BIP43.

- -- 
Justus Ranvier                   | Monetas <http://monetas.net/>
<mailto:justus@monetas.net>      | Public key ID : C3F7BB2638450DB5
                                 | BM-2cTepVtZ6AyJAs2Y8LpcvZB8KbdaWLwKqc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUJMrzAAoJEMP3uyY4RQ217DMH/1oGHayVo4smLM/OKeu1qqXC
Xex4NNh6g7Jsu2ulfJ5ow3g7jHEDzTBp33THhUv6cnV7CpDvTC+Y24LDRrYwOBQo
YuQ9u0NNtrcgoi+6vs8NuGO+yZyTyBYs1emOipsICsg42H8yhEHlrMyfOTJsO6r/
nAiqR+QH6isNOjQerd9Fs0nYQ6VANs8IksL41L8ch9YAvgKx7C8WxdcQrk/S2pNL
JwD7Q729J34x34HPnOb5j5Rfm1gvQInYELBu0YBaCy7D05PZd5nPSYqUC3n35hUA
AMvVf65jdQVBjvjlcqDPAPdBTQ3qjhQ+7EAWKJrwlrzhGXaWA3HpipRDUSyqzBg=
=OhH8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----