ACK for adding Kalle. Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo. - Sjors > Op 23 apr. 2021, om 04:09 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev het volgende geschreven: > > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to > assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. > > Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should be > fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression: > >> A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves >> rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have >> rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development >> mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any >> unaddressed substantiated objections to it. > > A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is > unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we can go > that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new BIP > editors, so I think this should be fine. > > Please speak up soon if you disagree. > > Luke > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev