From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YCaFm-0007c1-Rf for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:45:54 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.180; envelope-from=runesvend@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f180.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YCaFl-0006ID-IC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:45:54 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m14so191679wev.11 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:45:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.72.199 with SMTP id f7mr19294064wiv.58.1421527547560; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:45:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.41.193 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:45:27 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rune_Kj=C3=A6r_Svendsen?= Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:45:27 +0100 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434c0ba82ccf5050cdf2c0f X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (runesvend[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YCaFl-0006ID-IC Subject: [Bitcoin-development] IMPULSE: Instant Payments using the Bitcoin protocol X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:45:54 -0000 --f46d0434c0ba82ccf5050cdf2c0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi list Found this on reddit: http://impulse.is/ PDF: http://impulse.is/impulse.pdf I'd love to hear this list's thoughts. /runeks --f46d0434c0ba82ccf5050cdf2c0f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi list

Found this on reddit:=C2=A0http://impulse.is/


I'd love to he= ar this list's thoughts.

/runeks
--f46d0434c0ba82ccf5050cdf2c0f-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YEKQE-0006oJ-MH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:15:54 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YEKQD-0002RW-EI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:15:54 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y13so2462859pdi.8 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:15:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HKQUD0PubrBFiw8e2kIvk0w6pbATvtFe3gngZOXT2O0=; b=XSTGtswhv+FnnWNlT1T+RKT1n7wFPKNeMrffE4imUxHOvf9FQO48yna75XW3VbDK3s vatBbQs/oO1LYe8BQnBK8nF2FUPrf0K7jVaa+oKTF9Vyp21ATyZxR064VEkeGi7JscNs 8dEBk24CNasp5owPF6UfuCO09yXt2PjGSewjbdHWUHeI2U4x1qMlVsMMQBcLSPMoHaKy n+8RmosROz+hxu/wZOeHrM4cvuG/HQADCcDM4kzhh6l4M9jDhoUbezNUlZ/OpRSBemAQ MQF6qH2X8iDOKP4w3YDTingty4ERdGOiWb6SKZphC/mVEtgAwEikYKlYWioUjlAQyt0j 8vSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlMiNk0pwBiDk/gYc2Pccr8JB0CCq7LAa4x3X36SSLfWKLmHxsrPE8y3MdX43L8EOyNd+PQ X-Received: by 10.66.55.41 with SMTP id o9mr3086044pap.80.1421939967267; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-6-44-248.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.6.44.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fm4sm6305655pdb.88.2015.01.22.07.19.26 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:19:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54C114FE.4070308@thinlink.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:19:26 -0800 From: Tom Harding User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1YEKQD-0002RW-EI Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IMPULSE: Instant Payments using the Bitcoin protocol X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:15:54 -0000 On 1/17/2015 12:45 PM, Rune Kjær Svendsen wrote: > PDF: http://impulse.is/impulse.pdf > > I'd love to hear this list's thoughts. > Will success be defined by "BitPay Payment Channels Accepted Here" signs appearing in shop windows? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YEKdj-0002Xu-35 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:29:51 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-ob0-f178.google.com; Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YEKdh-0003oS-PR for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:29:51 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id nt9so2317144obb.9 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:29:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=uc21C0PBMTismm+mRO5E+Eh1scQ/r1vtUN/akSvyA7Y=; b=WC3BfBb1iYuKdo5j7rjhYMqpEhVN4jZTLwkc0nCnvzVuoNym541bNUabRBL8rwCJZr 6cBT65aYD4K0v8/bNYb27RyvaXFUbllWCSYgTQEL106LgC55hKV4r8J7zrmETTZsWuUF griaWtVM/LxeD1jHmaDdObnehmeyVG3LRxdnlYXc+k5Pzg75lD5QrFx+kE+5A7p4KWZQ WPZldgAbxdbHIDOM+S03D0CI8Go0GwtQ1SznzNwse6OR2RGXYuq0XwdVJmWowt/mmpvr slHf8zbr0FU9pa1vnmhwdEHju4jIjIwWbvvWY2OIEI5aD4SutX23BVDYzESxhVyJ9Ehj D4jw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk0Dpgig7hMo0yPTaZ2CJHlr12Bd05FlfGJLBJy9BIwxwEjb3sGq2FoOI6SjY25ggekBk+v X-Received: by 10.202.185.198 with SMTP id j189mr1423034oif.72.1421944184359; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:29:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.219.196 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:29:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C114FE.4070308@thinlink.com> References: <54C114FE.4070308@thinlink.com> From: Jeff Garzik Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:29:24 -0500 Message-ID: To: Tom Harding Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ce80effe2ab050d402d82 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YEKdh-0003oS-PR Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IMPULSE: Instant Payments using the Bitcoin protocol X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:29:51 -0000 --001a113ce80effe2ab050d402d82 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The user experience is significantly more secure than today. Presumably the future supports many payment facilitators, including m-of-n oracles, and this is perfectly compatible with that. On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Tom Harding wrote: > On 1/17/2015 12:45 PM, Rune Kj=C3=A6r Svendsen wrote: > > PDF: http://impulse.is/impulse.pdf > > > > I'd love to hear this list's thoughts. > > > > Will success be defined by "BitPay Payment Channels Accepted Here" signs > appearing in shop windows? > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. > Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. > Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --=20 Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ --001a113ce80effe2ab050d402d82 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The user experience is significantly more secure than= today.

Presumably the future supports many payment facilitato= rs, including m-of-n oracles, and this is perfectly compatible with that.

On Th= u, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>= wrote:
On 1/17/2015 12:= 45 PM, Rune Kj=C3=A6r Svendsen wrote:
> PDF: http:= //impulse.is/impulse.pdf
>
> I'd love to hear this list's thoughts.
>

Will success be defined by "BitPay Payment Channels Accepted He= re" signs
appearing in shop windows?


---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/s= fu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment



--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelistBitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://bitpay.com/
--001a113ce80effe2ab050d402d82-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YEKkS-0005r6-1u for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:48 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=justusranvier@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net; Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1YEKkQ-0004Sf-M7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:48 +0000 Received: from plantcutter.riseup.net (plantcutter-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64FE54085F for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: justusranvier) with ESMTPSA id 27F4020299 Received: from [192.168.202.127] (unknown [192.168.202.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nobelium.whale.ddns.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E05FD1DAB for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:35:20 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54C1270F.4090100@riseup.net> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:31 +0000 From: Justus Ranvier MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net References: In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=EAD9E623; url=http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2A5FDA70EAD9E623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Headers-End: 1YEKkQ-0004Sf-M7 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IMPULSE: Instant Payments using the Bitcoin protocol X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:48 -0000 On 01/17/2015 08:45 PM, Rune Kj=C3=A6r Svendsen wrote: > Hi list >=20 > Found this on reddit: http://impulse.is/ >=20 > PDF: http://impulse.is/impulse.pdf >=20 > I'd love to hear this list's thoughts. >=20 > /runeks I'm concerned about the silence that always erupts whenever privacy-hostile products are proposed. --=20 Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible. Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbakOKJFtB-k