public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink•com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Mempool "Expected Byte Stay" policy
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:24:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A5A837.1090203@thinlink.com> (raw)

Spammers out there are being very disrepectful of my fullnode resources 
these days!  I'm making some changes. In case others are interested, 
here's a description:

There is now a maximum size for the memory pool.  Space is allocated 
with a pretty simple rule.  For each tx, I calculate MY COST of 
continuing to hold it in the mempool.  I measure the cost to me by 
"expected byte stay":

expectedByteStay = sizeBytes * expectedBlocksToConfirm(feeRate)


Rule 1: When there's not enough space for a new tx, I try to make space 
by evicting txes with expectedByteStay higher than tx.

I'm NOT worrying about
  - Fees
    EXCEPT via their effect on confirmation time

  - Coin age
    You already made money on your old coins.  Pay up.

  - CPFP
    Child's expectedBlocksToConfirm is max'ed with its
    parent, then parent expectedByteStay is ADDED to child's

  - Replacement
    You'll get another chance in 2 hours (see below).


Rule 2: A transaction and its dependents are evicted on its 2-hour 
anniversary, whether space is required or not


The latest expectedBlocksToConfirm(feeRate) table is applied to the 
entire mempool periodically.

What do you think?  I'll let you know how it works out.  I'm putting a 
lot of faith in the new fee estimation (particularly its size 
independence).  Another possibility is clog-ups by transactions that 
look like they'll confirm next block, but don't because of factors other 
than fees (other people's blacklists?)



             reply	other threads:[~2015-07-15  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-15  0:24 Tom Harding [this message]
2015-07-15 19:18 ` Thomas Zander
2015-07-15 23:15   ` Tom Harding
2015-07-16  9:38     ` Thomas Zander
2015-07-16 16:50       ` Tom Harding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A5A837.1090203@thinlink.com \
    --to=tomh@thinlink$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox