From: Simon Liu <simon@bitcartel•com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail•com>,
Bitcoin development mailing list
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 100 specification
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:40:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E8A246.7030102@bitcartel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcZyK6LUcuKqSEuR-q0hTZOC3EdJsqY1HrS_ow0knDY=7A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jeff,
Thoughts on this part of the proposal:
"Absent/invalid votes are counted as votes for the current hardLimit.
Out of range votes are counted as the nearest in-range value."
1. Why should an absent vote be considered a vote for the status quo? A
non-voter should have zero impact on the result.
2. Why should out of range votes be counted? They're an invalid vote, a
spoiled ballot as such, and thus it would be better if they were discarded.
Regards,
Simon
On 09/02/2015 08:33 PM, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP 100 initial public
> draft: https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki
>
> Emphasis on "initial" This is a starting point for the usual open
> source feedback/iteration cycle, not an endpoint that Must Be This Way.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-03 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-03 3:33 Jeff Garzik
2015-09-03 4:45 ` Dave Scotese
2015-09-03 7:57 ` jl2012
2015-09-03 11:20 ` Btc Drak
2015-09-03 14:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-09-03 15:58 ` Btc Drak
2015-09-03 16:13 ` Jorge Timón
2015-09-03 11:59 ` Tier Nolan
2015-09-03 16:32 ` jl2012
2015-09-03 16:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-09-03 17:32 ` Btc Drak
2015-09-03 17:52 ` Peter Todd
2015-09-04 7:53 ` Andy Chase
2015-09-04 15:37 ` Simon Liu
2015-09-04 15:40 ` Btc Drak
2015-09-03 14:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-09-03 19:40 ` Simon Liu [this message]
2015-09-03 20:15 ` Oliver Petruzel
2015-09-03 20:34 ` Dave Scotese
2015-09-04 3:50 ` Peter Todd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E8A246.7030102@bitcartel.com \
--to=simon@bitcartel$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgarzik@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox