On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 7:12:09 AM UTC+8 moonsettler wrote:

Hi Weikeng,

CSFS is on signet. All the LNhance opcodes are on mutinynet.
https://github.com/lnhance/mutinynet-bitcoin/tree/mutinynet-cat-ln-hance
https://faucet.mutinynet.com/

[signet]
signetchallenge=512102f7561d208dd9ae99bf497273e16f389bdbd6c4742ddb8e6b216e64fa2928ad8f51ae
addnode=45.79.52.207:38333
dnsseed=0
signetblocktime=30

BR,
moonsettler

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 4:38 AM, Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative.com> wrote:

> I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, CSFS isn't.
> With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
>
> Thanks,
> Weikeng
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com.