From: "Odinn Cyberguerrilla" <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup•net>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@bitpay•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9rc1 release schedule
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:11:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61c05e986b4d1010d0cf76868db7d2af.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHLa0MVY6f02hK1CofM7bjLM=V1V0XKCWvHjBz=ozQdvA+xYA@mail.gmail.com>
<ABISprotocol hat: on>
regarding:
stuff not getting into blockchain in a day's time,
microdonations not facilitated as much as they could be,
that would be:
very bad
much news
such fail
Seriously, that would not be so good.
Hope I made you laugh a bit
> <vendor hat: on> BitPay sure would like to see CPFP in upstream.
>
> I think the main hurdle to merging was that various people disagreed
> on various edge case handling and implementation details, but no
> fundamental objections.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr•org> wrote:
>> On Friday, January 17, 2014 11:44:09 AM Wladimir wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr•org> wrote:
>>> > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/luke-jr
>>> >
>>> > These are pretty much all well-tested and stable for months now.
>>>
>>> #3242: Autoconf improvements needs rebase, and comment from jgarzik and
>>> me
>>> taken into account (about -enable-frontends=).
>>
>> I'll try to get this done over the weekend.
>>
>>> The others appear to be more controversial as they affect
>>> mining/consensus.
>>> I'd really like to see ACKs from more reviewers and testers there
>>> before
>>> merging.
>>
>> Can you elaborate on this? I can see how Proposals might, if buggy,
>> affect
>> consensus, but the rest shouldn't. I don't think there's anything
>> controversial in any of these (does someone disagree with CPFP?).
>>
>> Luke
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
>> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
>> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
>> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-18 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-16 9:09 Wladimir
2014-01-16 10:41 ` Warren Togami Jr.
2014-01-16 15:23 ` Luke-Jr
2014-01-17 11:44 ` Wladimir
2014-01-17 18:41 ` Luke-Jr
2014-01-17 20:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-01-17 21:04 ` Mark Friedenbach
2014-01-18 11:34 ` Jouke Hofman
2014-01-17 21:31 ` Luke-Jr
2014-01-18 8:11 ` Odinn Cyberguerrilla [this message]
2014-01-18 11:05 ` Wladimir
2014-01-18 11:28 ` Odinn Cyberguerrilla
2014-01-18 17:38 ` Mark Friedenbach
2014-01-19 2:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-01-19 10:24 ` Wladimir
2014-01-23 11:10 ` Wladimir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61c05e986b4d1010d0cf76868db7d2af.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net \
--to=odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup$(echo .)net \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=jgarzik@bitpay$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox