public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer@gmail•com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Generalized covenant to implement side chains embedded into the bitcoin block chain
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:53:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7856AC5A-D2AD-4C94-99BC-AA0F948E2B40@gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2215 bytes --]

I introduced you to gerneralized covenants[1] earlier, but in a domain specific context that de-routed us from technical discussion. Let me demonstrate the concept in a more generic use:

A covenant

or(and(pk(Transfer), _) covenant transitive, and(pk(Exit),_) covenant drop)

would put a coin under the alternative control of a Transfer and Exit keys together with the script in control of the current owner.
Additional transaction level validations of transactions spending input with covenants apply as in [1]

Owner of such coins would be able to transfer them to others provided an addtional Transfer signature, in which case the coin remains encumbered with the same covenant.
If Exit and owner signs the covenant is dropped on the output, it becomes a plain Bitcoin again.

The Thransfer and Exit signatures could be threshold signatures of a federation, whereby member decide if the proposed transfer transaction complies with whatever unique rules they impose.

The result is a federated side chain embedded into the Bitcoin block chain.

Bob could purchase some asset guarded by the federation with a transaction:

Inputs
100.0001 pk(Bob)

Outputs
0.1 or(and(pk(Transfer), pk(Bob)), and(pk(Exit), pk(Bob)) covenant or(and(pk(Transfer), _) covenant transitive, and(pk(Exit),_) covenant drop)
99.9 pk(Transfer)

Transfer to Alice with consent of the transfer validators:

Inputs
0.1 or(and(pk(Transfer), pk(Bob)), and(pk(Exit), pk(Bob)) covenant or(and(pk(Transfer), _) covenant transitive, and(pk(Exit),_) covenant drop)
100.001 pk(Alice)

Outputs
0.1 or(and(pk(Transfer), pk(Alice)), and(pk(Exit), pk(Alice)) covenant or(and(pk(Transfer), _) covenant transitive, and(pk(Exit),_) covenant drop)
100 pk(Bob)

Alice might be approved to exit with the exit signature of the federation:

Inputs
0.1 or(and(pk(Transfer), pk(Alice)), and(pk(Exit), pk(Alice)) covenant or(and(pk(Transfer), _) covenant transitive, and(pk(Exit),_) covenant drop)
99.9 pk(Transfer)

Outputs
99.9999 pk(Alice)

Tamas Blummer
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-June/017059.html <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-June/017059.html>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3606 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2019-06-29  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-29  5:53 Tamas Blummer [this message]
2019-06-29 20:25 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-06-30 16:57   ` Tamas Blummer
2019-06-30 17:50     ` Tamas Blummer
2019-06-30 22:25       ` Tamas Blummer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7856AC5A-D2AD-4C94-99BC-AA0F948E2B40@gmail.com \
    --to=tamas.blummer@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox