I have some more questions. 1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)? 2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo or be auto updated from the git repo? 3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be considered a BIP? On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: The goal is to improve the process, hash-seal our specs, and create an easy way for anyone with at least an email address to participate.