Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal

From: Jean-Paul Kogelman <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:38:37 +0000 (GMT)

I have some more questions.

1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?

2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo or be auto updated from the git repo?

3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be considered a BIP?

On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]> wrote:

The goal is to improve the process, hash-seal our specs, and create an
easy way for anyone with at least an email address to participate.