I was wondering, would it be possible to create an area where proposals like your NODE_BLOOM and BIP 38 could live? On 2013-10-20, at 11:25 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 08:27:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Peter Todd wrote: >>> FWIW I think that BIP's should have been done as a github repository, >>> allowing for dealing with this stuff transparently as a pull-request. >>> It'd also be useful to handle BIP's that way to make it easy to archive >>> them, update them, and keep a log of what and why they were updated. >>> Just put them in markdown format, which is pretty much feature >>> equivalent to the wiki now that markdown supports images. >> >> Agreed -- let's do it. I nominate you to do the conversion, and we'll >> put it up at github.com/bitcoin/bips.git. > > Done: https://github.com/petertodd/bips/ > > GitHub supports MediaWiki these days, so just directly copying from > 'View Source' in the bitcoin.it wiki worked pretty well; I archived the > exact text of BIP. Tables, images and math is all supported by github > and look fine, although github doesn't seem to support coloration in > tables. Users wishing to edit their pull-req's or create new ones can do > so easily by forking the repository - they can see their changes as they > go in GitHub. > > I've probably missed some stuff re: formatting, and I haven't changed > any of the submission guideline text in bip 1 yet, but that's probably > 90% of the work done. > > -- > 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > 000000000000000245a735ccc14b98552e152f773c07efa2e89dd7f0463f61cf