From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof•com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 70 refund field
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:27:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85A1792C-502E-4AC6-B8BC-A10C8FC1917F@bitsofproof.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T1POJ3KTqSz_c=SdYTg=EKWa9jqjOpHPZoMoPGXozsvJA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1088 bytes --]
I have nothing against incremental development. This will however not pick up until it offers some incremental benefit compared to current payment processor solutions,
such as e.g.
1. Symmetrical. One can also offer a payment.
2. Aggregating and Netting. Handle multiple installments and/or net with previous cash flows.
3. More secure. One has a check not only on the payment address (which already has one with https:// in the web shop scenario it is currently able support) but not on the refund.
On 28.03.2014, at 15:01, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof•com> wrote:
> May I ask how the current payment protocol is supposed to handle salaries?
>
> It doesn't.
>
> "walk before you run" and all that; lets see what problems we run into with the minimal payment protocol we have now (like refund outputs you have to remember forever) before we create an insurmountable set of problems by trying to solve everything we can think of all at once.
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1905 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-28 11:07 Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 11:25 ` Andreas Schildbach
2014-03-28 11:31 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 16:59 ` Andreas Schildbach
2014-03-28 18:19 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 20:56 ` Andreas Schildbach
2014-03-29 9:27 ` Roy Badami
2014-03-29 13:29 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-30 17:21 ` Andreas Schildbach
2014-03-28 11:38 ` Wladimir
2014-03-28 11:45 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 11:46 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 11:54 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 12:27 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 12:55 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 13:00 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 13:09 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 11:30 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 13:18 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 14:01 ` Gavin Andresen
2014-03-28 14:06 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 14:27 ` Tamas Blummer [this message]
2014-03-28 15:23 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 15:26 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 16:34 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 16:45 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-31 9:23 ` Peter Todd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85A1792C-502E-4AC6-B8BC-A10C8FC1917F@bitsofproof.com \
--to=tamas@bitsofproof$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=gavinandresen@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox