public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros)" <j@toom•im>
To: bitcoin-xt@googlegroups•com, bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Memory leaks?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:56:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99C42DE7-814A-48F8-AB28-A5ADD77A9FD9@toom.im> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2112 bytes --]

I just noticed that several of my running bitcoind processes were using around 3+ GB of RAM, even though the mempool itself seemed to be under control.

XXXX@prime:~/bin$ ./bitcoin-cli getmempoolinfo
{
    "size" : 1896,
    "bytes" : 37341328
}

[total memory usage not shown -- I restarted bitcoind as soon as I noticed, and didn't copy it down from top]

37 MB mempool, >3 GB RAM usage. Normally, when there aren't a lot of unconfirmed txns floating around the network, memory usage is around 600 MB, so this is quite unusual.

After restarting the process and letting it run for a few minutes, I get:

  PID USER      PRI  NI  VIRT   RES   SHR S CPU% MEM%   TIME+  Command
[###] [XXXX]     20   0 1402M  317M 49836 S  1.0  8.2  0:41.71 ./bitcoind -daemon

XXXX@prime:~/bin$ ./bitcoin-cli getmempoolinfo
{
    "size" : 1072,
    "bytes" : 670000
}

0.67 MB mempool, 317 MB RAM usage. Much more reasonable.


Here's another node I'm running that has been online longer, before restarting:

  PID USER      PRI  NI  VIRT   RES   SHR S CPU% MEM%   TIME+  Command
[###] [XXXX]     20   0 4961M 3540M 11080 S  2.8 45.3  8h20:11 bin/bitcoind -daemon

XXXX@feather:~$ bin/bitcoin-cli getmempoolinfo
{
    "size" : 3045,
    "bytes" : 39656126
}

39 MB mempool, 3540 MB total memory usage. After restarting bitcoind, I see:

[XXXX]@feather:~$ bin/bitcoin-cli stop
Bitcoin server stopping
[XXXX]@feather:~$ bin/bitcoind -daemon
Bitcoin server starting
[XXXX]@feather:~$ sleep 10; bin/bitcoin-cli getmempoolinfo
{
    "size" : 39,
    "bytes" : 47037
}


  PID USER      PRI  NI  VIRT   RES   SHR S CPU% MEM%   TIME+  Command
[###] [XXXX]     20   0 1640M  247M 67960 S  0.0  3.2  0:05.17 bin/bitcoind -daemon




Does anybody have any guesses where we might be leaking memory, or what is using the additional 2.4 GB? I've been using minrelaytxfee=0.00003 or similar on my nodes. Maybe there's a leak in the minrelaytxfee code path? Has anyone else seen something similar?

This issue appears to happen both with Bitcoin Core 0.10.1 and with Bitcoin XT 0.11B.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6926 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 496 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-13 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-13 21:56 Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros) [this message]
2015-10-13 22:49 ` odinn
2015-10-13 23:14   ` Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros)
2015-10-13 23:52     ` Dave Scotese
2015-10-14  0:08       ` Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros)
2015-10-14  0:25         ` Dave Scotese
2015-10-13 23:59     ` odinn
2015-10-14  7:22 ` Pavel Janík
2015-10-14  7:58 ` Tom Zander
2015-10-14  9:09   ` Mike Hearn
2015-10-14 15:19     ` odinn
2015-10-14  9:39 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2015-10-18 15:59   ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-10-19 19:17     ` Multipool Admin
2015-10-19 22:24       ` Multipool Admin
2015-10-20 10:12       ` Mike Hearn
2015-10-20 12:39         ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-10-21  3:01           ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-10-21  7:29             ` Tom Zander
2015-10-21 17:58               ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-10-22 16:06               ` Multipool Admin
2015-10-22 16:27                 ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-10-22 17:01                   ` Btc Drak
2015-10-23  6:41                     ` Rusty Russell
2015-10-21  7:59             ` Ross Bennetts
2015-10-17  4:37 ` admin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99C42DE7-814A-48F8-AB28-A5ADD77A9FD9@toom.im \
    --to=j@toom$(echo .)im \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-xt@googlegroups$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox