public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
			download mbox.gz: |
  1. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Bitcoin Integrated Address Feature?
     - by Ricardo Filipe @ 2019-04-02 23:52 UTC [99%]

  2. [bitcoin-dev] assumeutxo and UTXO snapshots
     - by James O'Beirne @ 2019-04-02 20:43 UTC [99%]

  3. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Bitcoin Integrated Address Feature?
     - by htimSxelA @ 2019-04-02 20:01 UTC [99%]

  4. [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Bitcoin Integrated Address Feature?
     - by nathanw @ 2019-04-02 16:53 UTC [99%]

  5. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Aymeric Vitte @ 2019-04-02 16:48 UTC [99%]

  6. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Dana L. Coe @ 2019-04-01 11:50 UTC [99%]

  7. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Melvin Carvalho @ 2019-04-01 11:22 UTC [99%]

  8. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH @ 2019-04-01  8:55 UTC [99%]

  9. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Satoshin @ 2019-04-01  3:07 UTC [99%]

 10. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Dave Scotese @ 2019-04-01  3:04 UTC [99%]

 11. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-04-01  3:02 UTC [99%]

 12. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Thomas France @ 2019-04-01  2:57 UTC [99%]

 13. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Omar Shibli @ 2019-04-01  2:55 UTC [99%]

 14. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Omar Shibli @ 2019-04-01  2:54 UTC [99%]

 15. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Peter Todd @ 2019-04-01  1:11 UTC [99%]

 16. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Ricardo Filipe @ 2019-04-01  1:04 UTC [99%]

 17. [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k USD/BTC
     - by Luke Dashjr @ 2019-04-01  0:30 UTC [99%]

 18. Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP - v2 peer-to-peer message transport protocol (former BIP151)
     - by Eric Voskuil @ 2019-03-25  6:32 UTC [99%]

 19. Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP - v2 peer-to-peer message transport protocol (former BIP151)
     - by Jonas Schnelli @ 2019-03-24 19:35 UTC [99%]

 20. Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP - v2 peer-to-peer message transport protocol (former BIP151)
     - by David A. Harding @ 2019-03-24 15:38 UTC [99%]

 21. Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP - v2 peer-to-peer message transport protocol (former BIP151)
     - by David A. Harding @ 2019-03-24 13:29 UTC [99%]

 22. [bitcoin-dev] New BIP - v2 peer-to-peer message transport protocol (former BIP151)
     - by Jonas Schnelli @ 2019-03-22 21:04 UTC [99%]

 23. [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - Hashed Time-Locked Collateral Contract transactions
     - by Matthew Black @ 2019-03-22 17:29 UTC [99%]

 24. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Payjoin privacy with the receiver of the transaction
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-22 16:05 UTC [99%]

 25. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Payjoin privacy with the receiver of the transaction
     - by Kenshiro [] @ 2019-03-22 11:15 UTC [99%]

 26. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Payjoin privacy with the receiver of the transaction
     - by Kenshiro [] @ 2019-03-22 10:23 UTC [99%]

 27. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-22  7:46 UTC [99%]

 28. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Johnson Lau @ 2019-03-22  4:23 UTC [99%]

 29. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Anthony Towns @ 2019-03-22  2:58 UTC [99%]

 30. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-22  1:59 UTC [99%]

 31. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Payjoin privacy with the receiver of the transaction
     - by rhavar @ 2019-03-21 16:52 UTC [99%]

 32. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Anthony Towns @ 2019-03-21 11:55 UTC [99%]

 33. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-21 10:05 UTC [99%]

 34. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Anthony Towns @ 2019-03-21  9:06 UTC [99%]

 35. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Johnson Lau @ 2019-03-21  8:37 UTC [99%]

 36. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-20  8:07 UTC [99%]

 37. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-20  7:38 UTC [99%]

 38. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Notice: List Infrastructure Migration
     - by Omar Shibli @ 2019-03-20  6:03 UTC [99%]

 39. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Rusty Russell @ 2019-03-20  3:33 UTC [99%]

 40. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Rusty Russell @ 2019-03-20  0:22 UTC [99%]

 41. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Notice: List Infrastructure Migration
     - by Peter Todd @ 2019-03-19 18:01 UTC [99%]

 42. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pre BIP: Solving for spam and other abuse with an HTLB
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-19  0:22 UTC [99%]

 43. [bitcoin-dev] Notice: List Infrastructure Migration
     - by Warren Togami Jr. @ 2019-03-18 22:35 UTC [99%]

 44. [bitcoin-dev] Payjoin privacy with the receiver of the transaction
     - by Kenshiro [] @ 2019-03-18 10:55 UTC [99%]

 45. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pre BIP: Solving for spam and other abuse with an HTLB
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-18  4:22 UTC [99%]

 46. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pre BIP: Solving for spam and other abuse with an HTLB
     - by Alistair Mann @ 2019-03-17 20:27 UTC [99%]

 47. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pre BIP: Solving for spam and other abuse with an HTLB
     - by Alistair Mann @ 2019-03-17 16:11 UTC [99%]

 48. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Christian Decker @ 2019-03-14 12:00 UTC [99%]

 49. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Aymeric Vitte @ 2019-03-14  9:46 UTC [99%]

 50. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-14  7:55 UTC [99%]

 51. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Anthony Towns @ 2019-03-14  7:24 UTC [99%]

 52. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-14  5:22 UTC [99%]

 53. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Karl-Johan Alm @ 2019-03-14  1:17 UTC [99%]

 54. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Karl-Johan Alm @ 2019-03-14  1:07 UTC [99%]

 55. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Dustin Dettmer @ 2019-03-13 22:30 UTC [99%]

 56. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Oscar Guindzberg @ 2019-03-13 14:41 UTC [99%]

 57. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Andreas Schildbach @ 2019-03-13 14:29 UTC [99%]

 58. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Anthony Towns @ 2019-03-13 11:10 UTC [99%]

 59. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Varunram Ganesh @ 2019-03-13  9:15 UTC [99%]

 60. Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-13  6:41 UTC [99%]

 61. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Anthony Towns @ 2019-03-13  3:23 UTC [99%]

 62. [bitcoin-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
     - by Anthony Towns @ 2019-03-13  1:41 UTC [99%]

 63. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-13  1:38 UTC [99%]

 64. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-13  1:34 UTC [99%]

 65. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Sighash Type Byte; Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-13  1:34 UTC [99%]

 66. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Gregory Maxwell @ 2019-03-13  0:54 UTC [99%]

 67. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Jacob Eliosoff @ 2019-03-12 22:39 UTC [99%]

 68. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Gregory Maxwell @ 2019-03-12 22:14 UTC [99%]

 69. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-12 21:08 UTC [99%]

 70. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Andreas Schildbach @ 2019-03-12 17:08 UTC [99%]

 71. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH @ 2019-03-12  7:34 UTC [99%]

 72. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal, Pay to Contract BIP43 Application
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-12  7:05 UTC [99%]

 73. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal, Pay to Contract BIP43 Application
     - by Omar Shibli @ 2019-03-12  5:53 UTC [99%]

 74. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Karl-Johan Alm @ 2019-03-12  5:44 UTC [99%]

 75. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pre BIP: Solving for spam and other abuse with an HTLB
     - by ZmnSCPxj @ 2019-03-12  4:14 UTC [99%]

 76. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-12  2:23 UTC [99%]

 77. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-11 19:15 UTC [99%]

 78. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-11 17:49 UTC [99%]

 79. [bitcoin-dev] Pre BIP: Solving for spam and other abuse with an HTLB
     - by Alistair Mann @ 2019-03-11 16:01 UTC [99%]

 80. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Dustin Dettmer @ 2019-03-10 18:28 UTC [99%]

 81. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Moral Agent @ 2019-03-10 18:24 UTC [99%]

 82. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by David A. Harding @ 2019-03-10 17:01 UTC [99%]

 83. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-10 15:22 UTC [99%]

 84. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH @ 2019-03-10 14:25 UTC [99%]

 85. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Jacob Eliosoff @ 2019-03-10  3:25 UTC [99%]

 86. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Karl-Johan Alm @ 2019-03-10  1:02 UTC [99%]

 87. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Karl-Johan Alm @ 2019-03-10  0:43 UTC [99%]

 88. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Lautaro Dragan @ 2019-03-09 19:52 UTC [99%]

 89. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-09 18:29 UTC [99%]

 90. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-09 18:29 UTC [99%]

 91. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-08 20:20 UTC [99%]

 92. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-08 20:14 UTC [99%]

 93. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Sjors Provoost @ 2019-03-08 19:12 UTC [99%]

 94. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-08 18:35 UTC [99%]

 95. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-08 15:57 UTC [99%]

 96. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Sighash Type Byte; Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-08 15:57 UTC [99%]

 97. [bitcoin-dev] Signet
     - by Karl-Johan Alm @ 2019-03-08  5:54 UTC [99%]

 98. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Gregory Maxwell @ 2019-03-08  0:52 UTC [99%]

 99. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP174 / PSBT extensions
     - by Gregory Maxwell @ 2019-03-08  0:40 UTC [99%]

100. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Eric Voskuil @ 2019-03-08  0:30 UTC [99%]

101. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Wilmer Paulino @ 2019-03-08  0:09 UTC [99%]

102. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Aymeric Vitte @ 2019-03-07 20:52 UTC [99%]

103. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Sighash Type Byte; Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-07 19:57 UTC [99%]

104. Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-07 19:50 UTC [99%]

105. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-07 19:44 UTC [99%]

106. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Symbol for satoshi
     - by Federico Tenga @ 2019-03-07 18:10 UTC [99%]

107. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Andreas Schildbach @ 2019-03-07 17:58 UTC [99%]

108. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP174 / PSBT extensions
     - by Andrew Chow @ 2019-03-07 15:34 UTC [99%]

109. [bitcoin-dev] Sighash Type Byte; Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-07 15:16 UTC [99%]

110. [bitcoin-dev] OP_CODESEPARATOR Re: BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Russell O'Connor @ 2019-03-07 15:03 UTC [99%]

111. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Sjors Provoost @ 2019-03-07 13:59 UTC [99%]

112. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Symbol for satoshi
     - by Tamas Blummer @ 2019-03-07 10:57 UTC [99%]

113. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Luke Dashjr @ 2019-03-07 10:44 UTC [99%]

114. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Symbol for satoshi
     - by Amine Chakak @ 2019-03-06 23:59 UTC [99%]

115. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Symbol for satoshi
     - by Gregory Maxwell @ 2019-03-06 23:35 UTC [99%]

116. [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: The Great Consensus Cleanup
     - by Matt Corallo @ 2019-03-06 21:39 UTC [99%]

117. [bitcoin-dev] BIP174 / PSBT extensions
     - by Andrew Poelstra @ 2019-03-06 18:08 UTC [99%]

118. [bitcoin-dev] bitcoinj 0.15 (segwit)
     - by Andreas Schildbach @ 2019-03-06 17:14 UTC [99%]

119. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Andreas Schildbach @ 2019-03-06 16:49 UTC [99%]

120. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Privacy literature review
     - by Adam Ficsor @ 2019-03-06 14:28 UTC [99%]

121. [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: BIP proposal - Signatures of Messages using Bitcoin Private Keys
     - by Aymeric Vitte @ 2019-03-06 10:37 UTC [99%]

122. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - addrv2 message
     - by Sjors Provoost @ 2019-03-06  9:05 UTC [99%]

123. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Dustin Dettmer @ 2019-03-06  4:00 UTC [99%]

124. Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - addrv2 message
     - by Gregory Maxwell @ 2019-03-06  3:02 UTC [99%]

125. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fortune Cookies to Bitcoin Seed
     - by Trey Del Bonis @ 2019-03-06  1:37 UTC [99%]

126. Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fortune Cookies to Bitcoin Seed
     - by James MacWhyte @ 2019-03-06  1:05 UTC [99%]

127. [bitcoin-dev] Removal of reject network messages from Bitcoin Core (BIP61)
     - by Marco Falke @ 2019-03-06  0:53 UTC [99%]

128. [bitcoin-dev] Mailing list downtime, archive, and its future
     - by Bryan Bishop @ 2019-03-06  0:34 UTC [99%]


Results 1-128 of 128 | reverse | sort options + mbox downloads above

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox