[bitcoin-dev] For discussion: limit transaction size to mitigate CVE-2013-2292
2015-07-21 18:09 UTC (6+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] QR code alternatives (was: Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias)
2015-07-21 14:58 UTC (5+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
2015-07-21 13:58 UTC (17+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Do we really need a mempool? (for relay nodes)
2015-07-20 22:14 UTC (4+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-20 16:09 UTC (13+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-20 8:56 UTC (4+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Significant losses by double-spending unconfirmed transactions
2015-07-18 15:09 UTC (23+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-18 11:46 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-18 11:21 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
2015-07-17 22:40 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] BIP0074 Draft (Dynamic Rate Lookup)
2015-07-17 15:47 UTC (6+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-17 1:02 UTC (5+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Mempool "Expected Byte Stay" policy
2015-07-16 16:50 UTC (5+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-16 16:18 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Administrivia - GPG, Archives, Breakage, TODO, mirrors, etc
2015-07-16 5:08 UTC (6+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.11.0 released
2015-07-15 11:20 UTC (4+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] REQ BIP # / Discuss - Sweep incoming unconfirmed transactions with a bounty
2015-07-15 8:26 UTC (12+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-14 8:29 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] SPV Mining reveals a problematic incentive issue
2015-07-13 17:49 UTC (13+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] About hardware accelerators advantages for full-node (not mining)
2015-07-13 13:47 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
2015-07-13 13:06 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Why not Child-Pays-For-Parent?
2015-07-12 10:18 UTC (17+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] A Proposed Compromise to the Block Size Limit
2015-07-10 2:55 UTC (10+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Can we penalize peers who relay rejected replacement txs?
2015-07-10 2:00 UTC (4+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Can we penalize peers who relay rejected replacement txs?
2015-07-10 1:18 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Can we penalize peers who relay rejected replacement txs?
2015-07-10 1:12 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed
2015-07-08 19:15 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Upcoming DOS vulnerability announcements for Bitcoin Core
2015-07-07 23:14 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin philosophical musings and pressures 7 years in [drifted from: txrate, forking, etc]
2015-07-07 19:21 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Introduce N testnet chains to test different block sizes
2015-07-06 16:50 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Thoughts on Forks, Scalability, and other Bitcoin inconveniences
2015-07-05 21:08 UTC (6+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] BIP 68 (Relative Locktime) bug
2015-07-05 19:57 UTC (7+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] [BIP draft] Flexible Offer and Acceptance Smart Contract
2015-07-05 2:30 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Fork of invalid blocks due to BIP66 violations
2015-07-05 1:32 UTC (8+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] List of approved pools
2015-07-04 15:42 UTC (3+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Fork of invalid blocks due to BIP66 violations
2015-07-04 10:04 UTC (5+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] July 4th 2015 invalid block fork postmortem BIP number request
2015-07-04 6:15 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Fork of invalid blocks due to BIP66 violations
2015-07-04 5:46 UTC
[bitcoin-dev] Fork of invalid blocks due to BIP66 violations
2015-07-04 5:40 UTC (3+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] Defining a min spec
2015-07-03 10:55 UTC (9+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] BIP 68 Questions
2015-07-03 1:19 UTC (2+ messages)
[bitcoin-dev] RFC: HD Bitmessage address derivation based on BIP-43
2015-07-02 15:45 UTC (3+ messages)
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox