public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Caldwell <mcaldwell@swipeclock•com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Monetary Authority for Bitcoin
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:57:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B09A5DE3EF411243BB3328232CD25A5DABFF021E7A@MAILR023.mail.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO7N=i0Y=sKXa=djc+8652e_0NiWLyMA9hrXyddaS+gOTu0yxQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2507 bytes --]

For what it's worth, once upon a time I pushed this agenda on Bitcointalk.  I'd say early 2011 or so.  The response I got was so strong and unanimous in favor of this point being absolutely non-negotiable that if the money supply were anything other than fixed, Bitcoin may as well be pretend e-dollars.  I was not just persuaded against it, I was put in my place.

I believe that if there ever becomes a consensus that Bitcoin's inflation parameters were a show-stopper for the Bitcoin economy, that the power to correct it lies with merchants, who would vote for changing the rules.  I believe they would do this not by changing Bitcoin, but by accepting, in parallel, a brand new alt coin that reflects the consensus as to how the inflation should be.  I believe such an alt coin would have its genesis at around the time that consensus moved toward accepting inflation, rather than adopting the seignorage of some other alt coin out there today.

Mike/Casascius


From: Ryan Carboni [mailto:ryan.jc.pc@gmail•com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 3:24 PM
To: apoelstra@wpsoftware•net
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Monetary Authority for Bitcoin

It is not a violation of the trust of those holding the currency. Many people bought Bitcoin in the hopes that it's value in the relation of other currencies will increase, not because there's a fixed money supply. The majority of people using Bitcoin as a currency in exchange for real goods are using the exchanges.

 My proposal will still allow for 4.9% semi-weekly variations in the price of Bitcoin, allowing for it to appreciate 11,800% per year.

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Poelstra <asp11@sfu.ca<mailto:asp11@sfu•ca>> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 02:01:07PM -0800, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> This is no doubt probably a very controversial Bitcoin Improvement Proposal
> and is also a very rough draft of one.
>
Ryan, you can stop there already because any change to the inflation
formula (supposing such a thing is even possible, which it's not)
would be a violation of the trust of those holding the currency, who
obtained it while believing that its inflation algorithm would not
change.

--
Andrew Poelstra
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net<http://wpsoftware.net>
Web:   http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew

"If they had taught a class on how to be the kind of citizen Dick Cheney
 worries about, I would have finished high school."   --Edward Snowden


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6434 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-09 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-09 22:01 Ryan Carboni
2013-12-09 22:06 ` Gavin Andresen
2013-12-10  1:19   ` Ryan Carboni
2013-12-10  4:05   ` Rick Wesson
     [not found] ` <20131209221130.GA22556@shavo.dd-wrt>
2013-12-09 22:23   ` Ryan Carboni
2013-12-09 22:57     ` Mike Caldwell [this message]
2013-12-10  8:19       ` Wladimir
2013-12-09 23:10     ` Jeff Garzik
2013-12-09 23:23       ` Jameson Lopp
2013-12-10  1:16         ` Allen Piscitello
2013-12-10  1:20       ` Ryan Carboni
2013-12-10 12:38         ` Jorge Timón
2013-12-11  0:07           ` Baz
2013-12-11  1:01             ` Jeff Garzik
2013-12-10  1:22 ` kjj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B09A5DE3EF411243BB3328232CD25A5DABFF021E7A@MAILR023.mail.lan \
    --to=mcaldwell@swipeclock$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox