public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert McKay <robert@mckay•com>
To: jan@uos•de
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.3.24
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 17:47:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimuNvsk_O2c6V03L9T=dgTVXbkpLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110701163558.GA7311@dax.lan.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2167 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:35 PM, <jan@uos•de> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:06:56AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> > > Not sure about OS differentiation, seems...wrong?  Maybe disabled by
> > > default on bitcoind but on by default on bitcoin?
> >
> > OK.  I mis-remembered the poll:
> >    http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=4392.0
> >
> > On by default                        8 (20%)
> > Off by default                               22 (55%)
> > On by default in the GUI, off by default in bitcoind   10 (25%)
>
> I just voted as well and now - with some extra votes in the meantime -
> it's 9 / 22 / 13. So exactly 50/50 between off (22) and some form of on
> (9 + 13).
>
> I'm in favor of turning it on by default in the GUI and leaving it off
> in bitcoind.
>
> I don't like UPnP much, I find it exemplifies exactly what is wrong with
> computer security today: Convenience trumps security almost every time.
>
> BUT: I don't think this is the moment to fight UPnP. It's the standard
> mechanism in use today to let a computer behind a NAT accept incoming
> connections. The user has already made the decision in regards to
> convenience over security. By enabling UPnP (or by buying a product that
> does this automatically) they are saying: I want it to "just work"
> instead of having fine-grained but more complicated control.
>
> Bitcoin is a P2P application and as such should use this
> mechanism. I think it's pretty clear that participating in a P2P network
> requires one to receive messages from other peers. At least no one seems
> to be concerned that Bitcoin (by default!) listens on port 8333. So I
> think it's only logical to extend that to work behind NATs as well


If bitcoin listened on IPv6 that might help for alot of people. Windows 7
users get a teredo IPv6 address (unless they disable it) when behind NAT on
IPv4. Take any win7 box and put it on a typical NAT /DSL setup this is what
happens. I think this might actually work for more users than have UPNP
support on their DSL gateways. teredo IPs aren't that stable though (they
change frequently) and they might tend to flood the address cache with stale
addresses.

Rob

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2679 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-01  0:07 Matt Corallo
2011-07-01  2:07 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-07-01  2:44   ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 12:41   ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01  8:00 ` Pieter Wuille
2011-07-01  8:39   ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-01 12:31     ` Gavin Andresen
2011-07-01 12:40       ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-01 15:06         ` Gavin Andresen
2011-07-01 16:35           ` jan
2011-07-01 16:47             ` Robert McKay [this message]
2011-07-01 17:47             ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 17:50               ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-01 17:52                 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 22:03                 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-01 22:07                   ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 17:59             ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-07-01 23:42           ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-02  0:37             ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-02  0:46               ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-02  0:51                 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-07-02  1:05                 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-02  1:12                   ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-02  2:05                     ` Gavin Andresen
2011-07-02 21:07                       ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-03  1:58                         ` Matt Corallo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTimuNvsk_O2c6V03L9T=dgTVXbkpLg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=robert@mckay$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jan@uos$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox