You very clearly didn't bother to read other mails in this thread. To make it easy for you, here's a few links:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-July/017147.html
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-July/017175.html

Matt

On Aug 13, 2019, at 23:05, Will Madden <will.madden@bridge21.com> wrote:

For the record, strong NACK. My understanding is that this breaks several established SPV implementations (such as early breadwallet for sure and possibly current BRD wallets) and I have yet to see quantitative prioritization or even a rational justification for this change.

Requiring SPV wallets to communicate with trusted nodes is centralization, and breaking functionality and implementations that enable this without a thoroughly researched rationale is highly suspect.

On Jul 20, 2019, at 1:46 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

Just a quick heads-up for those watching the list who may be using it -
in the next Bitcoin Core release bloom filter serving will be turned off
by default. This has been a long time coming, it's been an option for
many releases and has been a well-known DoS vector for some time.
As other DoS vectors have slowly been closed, this has become
increasingly an obvious low-hanging fruit. Those who are using it should
already have long been filtering for NODE_BLOOM-signaling nodes, and I
don't anticipate those being gone any time particularly soon.

See-also PR at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16152

The release notes will liekly read:

P2P Changes
-----------
- The default value for the -peerbloomfilters configuration option (and,
thus, NODE_BLOOM support) has been changed to false.
This resolves well-known DoS vectors in Bitcoin Core, especially for
nodes with spinning disks. It is not anticipated that
this will result in a significant lack of availability of
NODE_BLOOM-enabled nodes in the coming years, however, clients
which rely on the availability of NODE_BLOOM-supporting nodes on the
P2P network should consider the process of migrating
to a more modern (and less trustful and privacy-violating) alternative
over the coming years.

Matt
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev